by shammers still slogging along on January 6th, 2008

Question

Help answer this question below.

Are you a feminist? Are you sure?

Like
Report

Share:: Facebook; Twitter; Other

Answers. 39 helpful answers below.

by Greenleaf on January 30th, 2008
Most of the feminists I meet keep blaming and attacking men, fearing and putting down one particular group of people as the source of their problems. It seems like such hateful prejudice sometimes.

So, I'd have to say that I'm a Humanist, not a feminist.

As men gain more opportunities to be social and emotionally communicative around supportive, safe, open people, I'd like women to gain more opportunities to be ruthlessly competitive and objectifying in business, economic, and power-based matters.

Everyone needs more equality and diverse opportunity,
without any one group being scapegoated or attacked. All humans.
Comments
- Since the '70's, feminist has become such a derogetory label or so some would like. Webster's says the definition of feminism is, "one who believes in the political, social and economic equality of women." I would hope that would be everyone in this country.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on January 31st, 2008
- I don't believe in picking out only one group for equality. Call me a humanist. I would hope that would be everyone in this country.
  
  Report
  
  by Greenleaf on January 31st, 2008
- This has kinda been a gender deal.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on January 31st, 2008
- I believe women should be treated the same as men in the workforce. I don't know if they are doing a better job in Europe or Canada, but they probably are doing better. But I wager they are doing worse everywhere else.
  As a male physician, I see women MD's all the time. Infact there are more women physicians coming out of medical schools than men.
  That may be the most gender neutral profession.
  I always try and get a joke in:
  Isaac Asimov once gave a talk at a science fiction convention and was asked about women's rights. The woman asked him if he felt all women should be free. He said yes....that he hated it when they charged. (He apparantly got a sore shoulder for the remark)
  
  Report
  
  by james the first on February 1st, 2008
- Amusing . . . thanks for sharing!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on February 1st, 2008
- I agree. Good answer!
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on March 14th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
6 comments | Post one | Permalink
by gary on March 2nd, 2008
I used to be a feminist, but nowadays, feminism seems to want equal outcomes and not equal opportunity.
This is not equality. Some want both opportunity and outcomes to be in favour of women.
This is why i am more of an 'equalist' than feminist.
Comments
- Webster's Dictionary defines feminist and one who believes in "the economic, political and social equality of women." I think most people would agree with that.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 2nd, 2008
- Actually, I dispute that 'most [feminist] people would agree with that', at the heart of feminism, in it's beginning, it was about the equality of women. But now there is positive discrimination against men, women only colleges etc. is that equal?
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 3rd, 2008
- There's also black universities. It's not discrimination against men when they are considered to have all the power. You'll know you've lost it when you start attending Wellsley. :)
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 3rd, 2008
- Black only universities are discriminatory against whites, female only universities are discriminatory against men, and it is discrimination, regardless of how much male 'power' there is in the world. These universities just separate men and women all the more. This is what I mean when I spoke of 'positive discrimination'- there is no equal playing field. There is no such thing as 'patriarchy'- some 'male conspiracy' it is just competition, men do not need male only campuses; why do women?
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 4th, 2008
- Ever heard of the "good ole boy" syndrome? Or the "Peter" principle? It's why people of certain ethnicities give each other a "hand up" but women are not very good at doing that for each other. Too much sniping.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 4th, 2008
- answerbag will not let me respond to your comment, i'll keep trying.
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 6th, 2008
- Yes I have, But there is nothing wrong with that, it is not 'wrong' or 'sexist' to choose the best person for a job. Sexism does not exist, How do you determine what sexism is or discrimination is? It is relative to the 'victim' of the 'sexism' therefore it is only imagined as it can't be defined, how do you define what is sexism and what is just competition? it is therefore only a feeling. Why don't women or other ethnicities employ their own 'jane' principle? and employ women? I would say that forced positive discrimination against men is just another version of the 'peter' principle.
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 6th, 2008
- And why do people have to be 'given' opportunities? as though they have a right to be given an opportunity just because they are women or black, when someone else is better? That is discrimination, it is just competition a jungle, the 'good ole boy' syndrome also has a 'good ole girl syndrome' the difference is that men don't need to be 'handed' opportunity, they create opportunity themselves.
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 6th, 2008
- Unless a company is under a Consent Decree, they have no ethnic or gender goals to fill . . . unless they do business with the Federal Government. Often times companies are just too lazy to keep interviewing and recruiting to find a qualified person other than white. A company is supposed to have hiring statistics that mirror the community within which they do business. And if you don't think that men have a tendency to hire others just like themselves you've evidently been institutionalized for the last hundred years.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 6th, 2008
- "Unless a company is under a Consent Decree, they have no ethnic or gender goals to fill . . . unless they do business with the Federal Government"- I am afraid I cannot comment on this as I am not american and have no idea what laws you have.
  "And if you don't think that men have a tendency to hire others just like themselves you've evidently been institutionalized for the last hundred years."- I told you my position, I DO think that men hire others like themselves, you have missed my point of view and my point.
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 6th, 2008
- Perhaps I could understand a bit better if I knew in which country your reside.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 6th, 2008
- U.K
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 7th, 2008
- You and I are in totally different social environments.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 7th, 2008
- Why do you say that?
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 7th, 2008
- I agree with the equal outcome pursuit rather then equal opportunity.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on March 14th, 2008
- I was in charge of monitering my company's promotion from within policy as one of my duties. I reveiwed the job description prior to posting, reveiwed the posting before it went up and reviewed the qualifications of the candidates when the job came down. I scheduled the interviews and ensured the interview checklist was completed. Each qualification got a rating.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 15th, 2008
- If the candidate the department head selected had the highest score, the selection was approved. If not, they had to go back and reinterview the top 3 candidates. This ensured that the best qualified person was selected. That's what the hiring process is all about. No woman wants to be hired if she's not the best qualified! Not being hired when we were the best qualified is what discrimination suits are all about. That would seem to be pretty plain.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 15th, 2008
- "No woman wants to be hired if she's not the best qualified!"- As I said, In my first statement post, feminism DOES want this for women (equal outcomes).
  "Not being hired when we were the best qualified is what discrimination suits are all about. That would seem to be pretty plain."- How is it 'discrimination' if you have the best qualifications, but are not hired? There are numerous factors involved in hiring people, not just 'qualifications'. To assume you are a victim of discrimination would be imagined.
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 15th, 2008
- If a company have say, 10 female employees, who have worked for the company for 10 years who all apply for a vacant higher position within the company and all apply for this position and it ends up being given to a single male employee who has worked for the company for only 1 year, is that discrimination and sexism against the female employees?
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 15th, 2008
- Ya know, you're not getting through to me and I'm not getting through to you, so I'd just like to wish you a good evening where you are and thanks for the time you invested in my question. :)
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 15th, 2008
- Ok, But I do understand your position.
  My position is easily understandable.
  One of the problems of, 'sociology' is that it creates theories to try to explain complex problems in society, what many people then do is make the mistake of believing that sociological 'terms' and 'phrases' are real definable systems, one example being "patriarchy". It does not exist, it is a theory.
  Thankyou for the exchange :)
  
  Report
  
  by gary on March 15th, 2008
- Gary - Great answer.
  Gets my +3
  
  Report
  
  by 23Skidoo on April 29th, 2008
- You are a guy, you can't be a feminist, you advocated for women's rights till the obvious hit you - Life is a zero sum gain, one groups gains come at another's loss.
  
  Report
  
  by Alex Catgirl on April 20th, 2009
- I disagree Cat - or partially anyway.
  .
  1st - men can be feminists just like white people can be in favor of equal racial rights.
  .
  2nd - And feminism CAN be about equal rights, fair laws (marital rape, property rights, voting, workplace issues etc), and awareness raising without any loss on mens' parts. It can also be about promoting 1 gender over the other - and that part is a zero sum game.
  
  Report
  
  by 23Skidoo on April 21st, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
24 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Franklin on March 6th, 2008
Absolutely, positively not! I believe in treating women and men fairly and according to the law. However, feminists don't want equality, no matter how many times they claim they do.

Feminists have earned a reputation for blaming males (even boys) for all the world's ills, especially women's.

Feminists also have this hypocritical pattern of picking and choosing when they want equality and when they want to be treated a certain way because of being female.

Feminists also either support blatant hatred of men or participate in it themselves.

Their talk of equality is nothing more than a politically correct ruse to give themselves an heir of legitimacy. I see right through their hypocrisy.
Comments
- As for women blaming men for so many of the world's ills, sometimes one has to wonder . . . when all we elect is men. I'm a feminist by the Webster definition. I'm not a rabble rouser but I can tell you after spending nearly 40 years in the workplace, I'm still pretty enraged at what I had to wade through just to keep my job to support my 3 kids as a single mom. From dirty jokes to dinner invitations so I could keep my job (i was told . . . didn't fall for that), I became vigilant. Repressed anger often manifests itself as depression. No wonder so many women are on anti depressents. Thanks for reading this.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 22nd, 2008
- Are there laws preventing women from running for office as often as men? When more women run for office, more women will be elected. Very simple. Don't blame men.
  
  Report
  
  by Alan on March 25th, 2008
- It's not all about politics.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 25th, 2008
- I know it's not just politics, it's everything. Men are to blame for everything. That's just one of many reasons feminists have the reputation they do. Whatever is wrong, it's the fault of "men."
  
  Report
  
  by Alan on March 27th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
4 comments | Post one | Permalink
by JTP on January 31st, 2008
Nope.
Comments
- You don't believe in equality for women?
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on February 1st, 2008
- Of course not Shammer, women belong barefoot in the kitchen. That is when their not popping out babies. [/sarcasm]. Feminism isn't what it once stood for, it changed somewhere along in the '80s-'90s from a force working for equality, to one that wants more than equality. Most feminists I meet today are "gender feminists", or ignorant feminists, the few "equality feminists" I meet in this day and age I respect, but there arn't many. To sum it up this way, I'm fairly sure that I can debunk almost every crucial "issue" that feminists push today, starting from the supposed wage gap, to supposed domestic violence issues.
  
  Report
  
  by JTP on February 1st, 2008
- I appreciate your humor and for sharing your perspective. Thanks.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on February 1st, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
3 comments | Post one | Permalink
by miRi hates social norms and regulations on January 31st, 2008
nah
women aren't better than men, men aren't better than women. i have no resentment towards men for anything that i would automatically assume that women were better. it's just another term that the narrow minded have corrupted - it no longer means one that supports women's rights so much as one that supports women's rights and will rebel against men for their injustice to women
Comments
- Good slant on this. Thanks.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on February 1st, 2008
- welcome much. thanks for the q
  
  Report
  
  by miRi hates social norms and regulations on February 1st, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Franklin on April 13th, 2009
No I'm not and yes I'm sure. I am for equality but feminists are not.
Comments
- Hmmmm . . I've received responses with the same perspective from quite a few. Evidently, some in the generations after mine have taken equality to mean superiority? Sad.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 14th, 2009
- I and many others would be genuinely be pleased if modern feminism only sought equality and not female superiority. That would make life better for us all.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 14th, 2009
- When the movement began, the objective as I understood it was to give EVERYONE more choices as opposed to the traditional structured roles men and women had been slotted into. I think it's great that both women and men as parents can choose their own parenting choices and that lots of parents choose to have one parent home with the children.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 14th, 2009
- If they were satisfied with equality, I would be right with them. The beginning goals were noble, to give girls and women the same (equal) opportunities, options, and legal rights/protections/government support as boys and men. However, modern feminists demand greater than equal legal rights, protections, and more government programs/spending than men/boys. I can't support gender bias and inequality.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 14th, 2009
- I agree . . . that's not what it was meant to be. I know . . ..I was there in the workplace since 1969. It really hit employers in the '70's.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 14th, 2009
- http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/pubs/summary.php?id=462
  
  In the USA, women constitute on average 14.7 per cent of board members on Fortune 500 companies; in the UK, women hold 11 per cent of FTSE 100 directorships, according to the 2008 Sex and Power report published by the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission.
  
  Yep - that is equality!
  
  Report
  
  by dea_ex_machina on April 15th, 2009
- http://www.aamc.org/data/aib/aibissues/aibvol8_no7.pdf
  
  Report
  
  by dea_ex_machina on April 15th, 2009
- Those stats are reflective of personal choices women make. The opportunities are equal but women tend to make different choices than men. For example, 5.6 million American women choose to stay at home with their kids than work outside the home. More men than women are driven to climb the corporate ladder. Want proof?
  
  According to the US Census Bureau: By choice, 5.6 million women are stay at home moms, but only 143,000 men are stay at home dads. These are intelligent, competent women - some of whom could be CEOs if they chose - choose instead to change diapers and bake cookies. They are choosing to be a SAHM over a CEO.
  
  The links:
  Mothers: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/009747.html
  
  Fathers: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006794.html
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 15th, 2009
- Did you actually read the reports I sent in the link?
  
  How many adults live in USA?
  http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07databk.pdf shows 138 million tax payers in USA. And you expect me to accept that the fact that less than 1% of those are stay at home moms is significant when considering gender bias in the workplace??????? *LOL* oh dear!
  
  Report
  
  by dea_ex_machina on April 15th, 2009
- Great points, dea!!!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 15th, 2009
- The point is that women and men behave differently and make different choices, leading to different results. Women choose to stay at home with kids 39 times more often than men. (5.5 million vs. 143,000). Other differences:
  
  Women work 25% fewer hours than men. http://www.bls.gov/tus/current/work.htm
  
  Women take 50% more sick time (for themselves not including kids) than men. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080204212846.htm.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 15th, 2009
- These different choices lead to different results. Some blame those different results on gender bias, when it's actually just business, dollars and cents.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 15th, 2009
- yes, more women stay at home than men - but you do not seem to understand that the total number of women staying at home makes up for less than 1% of the population - therefore that statistic is statistically invalid as it does not provide a large enough sample to even begin to make valid comparisons within the workforce of the number of women in lower paid jobs than men!
  That fact remains that there are many fewer job opportunities in senior positions for women than for men - read that report - it highlights the difficulties women face in achieving higher paid jobs - and this has nothing whatsoever to do with childcare.
  
  Report
  
  by dea_ex_machina on April 16th, 2009
- You argue that women and girls are smarter and better than boys and men - and whites than blacks, based on your logic. I don't expect any logic, reason, or non-misandristic unbiased thought from this discussion.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 16th, 2009
- The issue is not about how many women stay at home. This discourse had strayed totally off the subject of the question. Either one is FOR social, economic and political equality for women or one is NOT. It's a simple yes or no question. Please don't add one's own agenda.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 16th, 2009
- Please see my original answer above.
  
  Report
  
  by Franklin on April 16th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
16 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Yahoo Answers Is A Fraud on December 7th, 2008
No.
Comments
- Thanks so much for answering, awc!! Have good holidays!!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on December 8th, 2008
- You're welcome. Happy Holidays.
  
  Report
  
  by Yahoo Answers Is A Fraud on December 8th, 2008
- Did you just change your answer?
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on December 8th, 2008
- Yes. I thought your question said "Are you an anti-feminist".
  
  Report
  
  by Yahoo Answers Is A Fraud on December 8th, 2008
- Sooo . . . you don't believe women should be equal (nothing more, nothing less)to men socially, politically and economically? :)
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on December 10th, 2008
- Well from what I've heard, marriages have broken up because of feminists. And when I used to ask questions on GWS, they would report them and my questions will be deleted. That's why I resent them.
  
  Report
  
  by Yahoo Answers Is A Fraud on December 10th, 2008
- Okay . . . thanks for the comments. :))
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on December 10th, 2008
- You're welcome.
  
  Report
  
  by Yahoo Answers Is A Fraud on December 10th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
8 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Colt COAT of Justice on December 9th, 2008
NO! I love and respect all women!!
Comments
- Being a feminist just means that you believe women should be equal (nothing more, nothing less) socially, politically and economically. That's all it means.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on December 10th, 2008
- I know the meaning well but felt that my remark covered all you have mentioned. Women are more than equal!
  
  Report
  
  by Colt COAT of Justice on December 10th, 2008
- Okay . . . thanks for sharing your perspective. :)
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on December 10th, 2008
- You are most welcome! Happy Holidays!
  
  Report
  
  by Colt COAT of Justice on December 10th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
4 comments | Post one | Permalink
by neveroddoreven on May 11th, 2008
In it's origional form yes, men and women should be equal... but some feminists now want women to be treated better than men, which i don't agree with, equality all the way...
There are some things now that do descriminate against men, there are lots of women only clubs, but the men only clubs now have to let women in, that is discrimination.
Some people forget that...
Comments
- As you're describing, it certainly sounds like discrimination. I just believe women should be equal politically, economically and socially. It's that simple. I think most people agree with that definition and that's the definition of feminist.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on May 11th, 2008
- Yeah, that is a good thing... equality for all. But I do think that today the definition has been warped. :D
  
  Report
  
  by neveroddoreven on May 12th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by The Reverend Soleil on March 6th, 2008
Depends on how you define the term -- many of the so-called "leaders" of the feminist movement have strayed so far from the original intent of those organizations that they've become unrecognizable.
Comments
- I whole-heartedly agree, points for you!
  
  Report
  
  by veriria on March 6th, 2008
- I really don't keep up with the women in the forefront of NOW, so I'm unsure, but you very well could be right. I do enjoy hearing the comments of Gloria Steinam when I hear her quoted from time to time. I think she's pretty much right on!!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 22nd, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by 23Skidoo on April 29th, 2008
To be honest I'm having a harder and harder time with it. I have met so many feminists who see the world in unreal ways - for instance that domestic violence is always about male suppression of women - that I think the movement has lost touch.
I'm for equal opportunity for everyone. M/F B/W etc...
Comments
- Interesting bit of information. Violence against women is wrong but is more anger run amok than supression of women . . . in my opinion. Unless the perp is a white supremist or something.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on November 20th, 2008
- My point is that some feminists believe that DV is ONLY about male suppression of women. They deny gay male DV, lesbian DV and any DV that in which, let's say, the man is emotionally troubled.
  
  Report
  
  by 23Skidoo on November 20th, 2008
- That's not right either!!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on November 20th, 2008
- yep.
  
  Report
  
  by 23Skidoo on November 20th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
4 comments | Post one | Permalink
by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on November 21st, 2009
I am 100% sure that i am not feminist .
Comments
- Good you know what you are.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on November 21st, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by DA BEN DAN yanggui zi on January 31st, 2008
yes...and yes I am sure:)
Comments
- Thanks, as usual, Da ben!!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on February 1st, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Alex Catgirl on April 20th, 2009
Proudly so.
Comments
- Thanx, Alex!!!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 21st, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Brian on April 11th, 2009
Yes I am.

I'm sure that I support full rights and fully equal opportunities for women.

IMO it was feminists (even though they might have been called suffragists back then) that procured the right to vote for women, the right for women to participate in sports, the fair treatment of female rape victims, a woman's right to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy, and brought the world's attention to the oppression of women by the Taliban.

Perhaps there are some extreme feminists that I might not agree with, but I don't discount an entire movement because of them anymore than I consider the Taliban or OJ to be representative of men in general.
Comments
- You win the 64 million jackpot for the best answer!!!! Thanks!! :)))))
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on April 12th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by SliverBelle&Chippers on December 28th, 2010
Radically
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by G82 on November 27th, 2009
Hail no. I'm positive.
Comments
- Thanx, G82.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on November 27th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by quack is whack on November 22nd, 2009
I am absolutely, 100% a feminist of the Third-Wave variety, and yes, I'm sure. The more I learn about the world - about sociology, about economics, history, etc, the more surely secured I am in my position as a feminist.

Reading a lot of the other responses that you've gotten has been somewhat disheartening for me, though. Feminism these days has become a rather dirty word, thanks to the conservative backlash that's attempted to "put women in their place" through media and economics. It's disheartening because of the level of antipathy I see towards all women because so many men seem to feel threatened by feminism.

To be sure, many feminists themselves have given the movement a bad name - but those are individuals who do not represent the larger movement, which was instigated by real oppression and inequlity. In my opinion, no true feminist would ever devalue men just because they are men. No true feminist would ever engage in outright man-bashing. Men are human beings, and very valuable members of society, just like women are - and despite what many men seem to think, feminists are NOT out to feminize men or make them submissive to us. As a gender that has been historically oppressed, what would we gain by oppressing others, except to perpetuate a vicious cycle?

I realize that many men feel displaced by the feminist movement and just don't know what to make of it, or new gender relations. For so long, masculinity has been equated to dominance and breadwinning. One of the major shortcomings (among many) of feminism in the past is that it failed to recognize that the proscribed Image of "normal" masculinity needs to be re-evaluated in the face of the changing image of femininity. If women are bringing in their own income and are therefore allowed the same leverage as men, it's understandable that men would feel displaced given that their perceived "power" (dominance in the household as a result of womens' economic dependence on them) has been made obsolete. But the problem here isn't feminism; it's that while women have re-defined their femininity, men have failed to do the same for themselves regarding their own masculinity (though it seems this is changing).

Another shortcoming of feminism from the past is that it has focused almost exclusively on Western, white, middle- and upper-class women, and their specific brand of oppression. The main issue here being the misnomer that feminism and womens' equal rights was all tied in to their entering the workforce. But women have always worked - in the global capitalist market, women have historically been the lowest-waged laborers. So let me re-phrase that: poor women, who are disproportionately women of color, have always worked. For wages, at least: whoever says that taking care of a household and raising children isn't "work" was seriously addled in the brains. But the feminist movement as we're most familiar with it has been mostly concerned with the middle- and upper-class women. Even today, we upper/middle-class white Western women who both work and raise families are almost entirely dependent on the economic vulnerability of poor women. In my opinion, feminism needs to recognize that as an issue as well. Because if we're going to scream "equality" between genders, we need to be damn sure that we don't mean the equality of some but not others.

So here is my definition of feminism: the belief that women and men should be socially, politically, and economically equal, with the same opportunities as well as repercussions for both sexes, regardless of race or class. If you agree with this statement, you are also a feminist.

The problem is actually achieving this sort of equality, because the vast majority doesn't fully understand what the real problems, that have persisted to this day, are in the first place. And it's a really complex issue that goes far beyond the scope of just gender relations alone.

Thanks for listening to my rant =P
Comments
- Excellent and detailed answer. My perspective exactly. I lament the fact tht feminist has become practically a dirty word and demeaning label. Sad for those of us who went through it in the '70's. I would give you 1000 points if I could.
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on November 22nd, 2009
- Goddamn, that was a good answer, as I usually expect from you darling.
  
  Report
  
  by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on November 22nd, 2009
- Thanks y'all ^_^ <3
  
  Report
  
  by quack is whack on November 23rd, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
3 comments | Post one | Permalink
by ryguy on December 29th, 2010
I am a feminist up to the point where women should have equal rights and responsibilities. I don't believe in giving them any sort of legal advantage over men. I think that women should have to register for selective service when they turn 18, just like men do. I don't think they should have an immediate advantage in custody hearings as they do. I don't think they should automatically expect men to pay on dates anymore. In gaining equality one must also gain responsibility.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by CatholicWoman on December 29th, 2010
No.
I am glad for the type of feminism that led us to the right to vote and equal treatment under the law. The ability to be independent of men as concerned with work, property, etc....

However, I don't support the kind of feminism that says a woman who chooses to be a stay at home mom is wrong, or who "loves, honors, and obeys" a godly husband is wrong.
I'm glad we as women have the oppertunity to be in the workforce and to be in a position to define the type of relationship we want with whom we choose.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by kaetalist on December 29th, 2010
Yes and I'm male, but there are just as many women who are full of bullshit as men.
We are all people, so who is causing all this discrimination and inequality, surely men and women should be joining forces to get the people who are causing this.
Comments
- I think that it is your failure to identify the "people who are causing this" that is the problem.
  
  Before very long, I think you will find that they are the feminists that you are joining forces with. Look before you leap.
  
  Report
  
  by Benjamin_P on March 24th, 2011
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on November 21st, 2009
I'm a white male from the south, and also a proud and staunch feminist. That combination alone tends to blow people's minds.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by freeluncher on January 6th, 2008
Yes, I am. It's the only way for a bloke to get his leg over these days!
Comments
- lol . . . I'm not sure what that means?
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on January 6th, 2008
- I think I figured that out, duh!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on January 31st, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by zoneman on November 28th, 2011
yes and yes
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Moongrim on December 29th, 2010
Well I feel that a feminist is someone who feels that women should be treated like an adult.

So I guess that makes me one.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by gary on March 6th, 2008
answerbag will not let me post my response to you, i will keep trying.
Comments
- Thanx!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on March 30th, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Bartman on January 31st, 2008
Are you? How cute..
Comments
- Oh yes . . . one of the original. Was around when Betty Friedan let the horse out of the barn!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on January 31st, 2008
- :)
  
  Report
  
  by Bartman on January 31st, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Superquack on January 31st, 2008
At times. Only when no one can see me.
Comments
- Cute, thanks!
  
  Report
  
  by shammers still slogging along on February 1st, 2008
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Thriftymaid on December 31st, 2010
yes
no
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Anonymous on December 31st, 2010
Having had some training under 1970s feminists I consider myself one.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Old School on December 28th, 2010
Maybe....but I'm good at detecting duplicate questions....;-D...

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/537272
Comments
- when i asked the question it didnt tell me it was already asked....sorry :]
  
  Report
  
  by restore4 on December 28th, 2010
- No problem....;-D...
  
  Report
  
  by Old School on December 29th, 2010
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Benjamin_P on March 24th, 2011
No I am not a feminist, and I am very certain on this point.

I do however support "equality of opportunity" and "equal pay for equal work". I support the right to vote and the rights to work.

However, I also recognise that allowing women equal opportunities will not deliver equal outcomes. Men and women differ naturally in interests, phsycological makeup and physical construction. These differences can (and will) lead to natural biases in the workforce and society. Enforcing a 50/50 split in all aspects of life is not serving anyones interests.

Futhermore, there are some areas where women gain unfair advantages and the rules of equality are applied selectively by feminists and governments. The law is one example: because women still recieve lighter sentinces and will be aquitted for crimes that men do not. They are typically handed lighter sentences. Which seems to indicate that the old principles of not holding women as responsible moral agents is still in effect.

In many murder cases a woman could be aquitted by entering a plea of "momentary insanity" - on the grounds that she was "emotionaly compromised" and "incapable of rational thought". She is not considered a moraly responsible when she acts emotionally. But a man cannot defend himself in this manner. He cannot say that he hit his wife because a momentary fit of rage (Which is what most battery is). Men do not mean to injure women, they do so because their anger takes over... So the defence of "momentary insanity" should not be applied. IMO, A person should be held accountable for their actions. Esp. When a man is dead because of them.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by fizzled on December 29th, 2010
No. Do I believe as a woman I deserve equal rights? Sure, yes, of course. Do I believe in acting like a crazy bitch in order to raise a point? No.
If anything feminists are one of the reasons females appear the weaker sex... constantly trying to prove themselves - it's sort of pathetic.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Weylon on July 10th, 2011
Yes and no.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Anonymous on November 28th, 2011
I have heard that they preach equality for men and women and believe in protecting all rights. I'm a man and I support that although I think a masculine movement needs to be strengthened as well as right protection organization for all groups no matter how small.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Unicorn Man on November 28th, 2011
No. Yes.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by JohnnyH73 on July 10th, 2011
I am not a feminist and I am sure. I believe women have equal rights, but they cannot take those rights without assuming obligations. A woman who is doing the same job as a man deserves the same pay. A woman should never get promoted because she is a woman. A woman must never even attempt to use the fact that she is a woman to get anything.

When I was in the military it showed up time and again- a woman getting a promotion instead of a much better qualified man. When I was up for E-4 6 months early, the group of candidates included myself and a guy I worked with (both with perfect ratings AND medals), two middle of the road guys, and a female who had lowers ratings than any of us and a letter of reprimand. It was the female who got the stripe. True story. The squadron decided she was more desrving than two guys who had just won the highest possible rating from a huge AF inspection and gotten medals out of it. And this wasn't wartime. Medals were scarce in the USAF in 1998, especially for low-level enlisted. I tried to file a complaint and was told I was being sexist.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by bwsf on February 8th, 2010
Every woman is whether she knows it or not. Feminism at its core (without all those crazies who take things to extremes) is about equality and nothing else. Every human deserves to be equal to every other human. Many call themselves "humanists" instead.
Comments
- Not even close to true. Most women state very clearly that they aren't feminists. Why? Because they have seen that goals of feminism obviously aren't equality, and are anti-male.
  
  If feminists truly wanted equality, they would address issues such as the 60/40 (and climbing) female/male college graduation rate imbalance, but they don't because they aren't truly aiming for equality at all.
  
  Report
  
  by G82 on March 25th, 2010
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Twibbieful on July 10th, 2011
Yes. I think more people SHOULD be Feminists, because Feminism is defined by believing in equal rights for women - and if you don't think that you're just... quite stupid. And we need that solidarity. More young women saying "no, I'm not a Feminism" is damaging to the women's rights cause.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink

Question

Are you a feminist? Are you sure?

Answers. 39 helpful answers below.

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Professionally Researched

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Answerbag.com Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!

Answerbag.com
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!