by miRi hates social norms and regulations on January 4th, 2008

miRi hates social norms and regulations

Question

Help answer this question below.

What are the historical reasons for why the apocryphal texts are not in the protestant bibles?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 2 helpful answers below.

  • by steve0079 on January 5th, 2008

    steve0079

    The Apocrypha refer to texts which are left out of officially sanctioned versions ('canon') of the Bible. The term means 'things hidden away,' which implies secret or esoteric literature. However, none of these texts were ever considered secret.

    In some Protestant Bibles, they are placed between the New and Old Testament. In the Roman Catholic Bibles the books are interspersed with the rest of the text. In this case they are also called 'Deuterocanonical', which means 'secondary canon.'

    Jerome rejected the Deuterocanonical books when he was translating the Bible into Latin circa 450 CE, (see the Vulgate). This was because no Hebrew version of these texts could be found, even though they were present in the Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint). However, they eventually were accepted by the Church, and most of them remained part of the Bible. Protestants rejected these books during the Reformation as lacking divine authority. They either excised them completely or placed them in a third section of the Bible. The Roman Catholic Council of Trent, on the other hand, declared in 1546 that the Deuterocanonical books were indeed divine.

    Of these books, Tobias, Judith, the Wisdom of Solomon, Baruch, and Maccabees, remain in the Catholic Bible. First Esdras, Second Esdras, Epistle of Jeremiah, Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, Prayer of Manasseh, Prayer of Azariah, and Laodiceans are not today considered part of the Catholic apocrypha.

    With one exception, all of these books are considered 'Old Testament'. The apocryphal New Testament 'Letter of Paul to the Laodiceans', was once incorporated in many versions of the Bible. However Laodiceans is now considered just a pastiche of other Epistles, and is omitted from contemporary Bibles.

    There are many other apocryphal books, which do not fall into the 'Deuterocanonical' category, such as the many additional New Testament Gospels, and the apocalyptic book of Enoch. Some of these can be found in the Apocrypha section.

    http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/apo/index.htm

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by romans116 on April 7th, 2008

    romans116

    Here are some reasons I have discovered when searching for answers on this question:

    -It is not in the Hebrew version of the Old Testament and was never accepted by the Jews

    -It was never quoted by Jesus or the New Testament figures though they knew it existed

    -Contain historical and geographical errors (God cannot make mistakes)

    -Teach doctrine contrary to the Bible (prayer for the dead, 2 Macc. 12:44 - prayer to saints, 2 Macc. 15:14; Baruch 3:4 - purgatory and redemption after death, 2 Macc. 12:42, 46 - worship of angels, Tobit 12:12) (God cannot contradict himself)

    -Its not found in any catalogues of canonical books in the 1st-4th centuries A.D.

    -Do not claim divine authority or inspiration


    Hope this helps!

    God bless!

    • Like
    • Report

    3 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading What are the historical reasons for why the apocryphal texts are not in the protestant bibles?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Should you put ice on a burn
Apocryphal texts
What are the historical and geogphical errors in apocryphal books