ANSWERS: 9
-
What about No choice, castration and life sentence.
-
I take the 25 years
-
Either way your screwed. In jail they'd have there way with you. Then you'd get into fights to prove your not some one to mess with so others would leave you alone & by which adds more time to your sentence. so if your serving 10 yrs. you'll still end up serving the 25 and have no balls. the prisoners would love that. .
-
I had to be castrated after puberty for medical reasons. I am comfortable with no balls, and given the choice, I would willingly get them cut off.
-
Since rape is not purely motivated by sex drive but by aggressive urges to control others, what good would castration serve? To ask people to imagine they're rapists is bad enough but to ask what sentence they'd prefer... well, most men would feel horrified at the thought of losing their balls. But most men are not rapists and power-freaks! ANd if the rapist was clued-up he'd know that the shorter sentence wouldn't take away his anger and he'd be even angrier when released after such 'mutilation'. Then what? Not rape, perhaps, but murder, torture, hmmm... And eunuchs often consorted with their charges in the harem so where does that leave us?
-
25 years for sure....however if the court is offering chemical castration that may change my answer.
-
well the whole thing really depends on if I had actually done it. If I didn't, I'd choose the 25, if I had, I'd go for the castration.
-
I prefer Chaucer's Knight's solution: Execution unless you can discover what it is that women REALLY want within a year's time.
-
If you don't get castrated on the outside. You'll definitely have your balls removed psychologically after being in there for 25 years with that crime. I don't think rapists deserve to have balls anyways. I would choose that they would get castration before the actual amount of time.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 