Instead of a war, where poor young people lose their limbs and lives for little or no reward, would you support instead a bare-knuckle fight to the death between the leaders of America, Israel, UK, China, Russia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and Bin Laden?
by 
freeluncher
ANSWERS: 7
-
I agree. It's between them only. They should solve out themselves instead of asking young people to do their dirty jobs
-
Though I kind of agree with the concept...I really wouldn't want to trust the future of the US on the outcome of a fistfight where Bush is doing the fighting. LOL
-
Did you ever think that those poor young people actually sign up for the armed services? I do beleive no one involuntary goes to war since Vietnam.
-
There's just one problem with that. BAD GUYS DON'T FOLLOW THE RULES. That means, no matter who wins, it wouldn't make any difference at all. We'd still end up with a war.
-
maybe if Ahhnold could substitute for the Pres.
-
Are you crazy? We would lose for sure and the cheater would rule over us. Count me out.
-
Im afraid not... wars are fought in the battlefield by militia, soldiers who fight & die for their country and its people. Allowing that sort of honor to political leaders wont do justice. Anyways, the political leaders or army leaders/generals are there to guide the soldiers, plan strategies, and also make decisions in the best interest of its people.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC