Do you think moderation should be handled more by the AB community rather than by moderators. example ; should a question be flagged as ""nonscence "" three or five times before it goes to a moderator.?
by 
Norman_Outside the lines
ANSWERS: 6
-
No...sometimes that many people don't see a question or answer to flag it. If it is genuinely nonsense, I think it needs to be cleaned up as soon as possible.
-
i think all of society should be ran that way, it makes us have mmore of a responsibility for ourselves and the community, but sadly things dont get ran smoothly that way :). Its best just to leave it up to the few in charge..
-
If you are talking about my question, friend, then probably yes. It was a bit of nonsense, I suppose. Thank you for your concern though. :) -In the Master's service. Thank you and God bless you!
-
I have real problems with the method of flagging things..if it is a definite duplicate, or absolutely vulgar/offensive/vile, then I agree that the question should be flagged. But the questions that are deemed "nonsense"..aye, there's the rub! That word makes no sense, because some/many/most (I don't know which) have been reversed because they are not "nonsense". People could team up/gang up/conspire/collaborate to "attack" so I don't know if we would be any better off having 3-5 people do the flagging. Hopefully wiser people than I will come up with some solution to the problem. :)
-
I don't think so. In some questions and answers, some users may not see this as anywhere "nonsense" or "spam/offensive". And some questions, need to be taken care of quickly and effectivily.
-
Actually I don't think they should allow the "nonsense " rating. If people think the question or comment is stupid, just ignore it. I don't understand why it bothers people. However, if it has to be their, I do think that there should be a 2 or 3 minimum.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC