A world without enough underwear...

wouldn't it be great.........i once read a futuristic novel where they had object libraries, so you could borrow something like a great oil painting for a while so you could enjoy it then give it back. I liked that idea.

A Socialist Republic. Unequity. Are they sharing because they have to or because they want to? It can lead to the hard working being exploited by the lazy since they have to share their things regardless of how hard they work.

A terrible world...i dont want nobody touchin my Xbox i bought that with my own money.

A very cool one!

That would be what ever person should strive for everyday they are alive.

... not very capitalistic ... sounds socialistic or communistic ... It COULD be great, if everyone willingly and openly shared in all things and all ACTIONS. Or it could be bad if everyone shared objects but NOT actions ... as mentioned, the lazy vs the workers ...

I think this would work in small communities. Anything exceeding 100 people and I think there would be problems. There wouldn't be any incentive for people to work other than boredom or forced labor. People would have to hide and/or horde items since everything would be up for grabs. I think such a society would either have to be an anarchy in which it's every man, woman, and child for him/herself, or a harsh socialistic police state in which sharing would end up being regulated by an elite few.

It would be something between Anarchy and Communism, and it probably wouldn't work, since people are by nature, greedy.

In India, people learn the essential themes of cultural life within the bosom of a family. In most of the country, the basic units of society are the patrilineal family unit and wider kinship groupings. The most widely desired residential unit is the joint family, ideally consisting of three or four patrilineally related generations, all living under one roof, working, eating, worshiping, and cooperating together in mutually beneficial social and economic activities. Patrilineal joint families include men related through the male line, along with their wives and children. Most young women expect to live with their husband's relatives after marriage, but they retain important bonds with their natal families. Large families tend to be flexible and well-suited to modern Indian life, especially for the 67 percent of Indians who are farmers or agricultural workers or work in related activities. As in most primarily agricultural societies, few individuals can hope to achieve economic security without being part of a cooperating group of kinsmen. The joint family is also common in cities, where kinship ties can be crucial to obtaining scarce jobs or financial assistance. Numerous prominent Indian families, such as the Tatas, Birlas, and Sarabhais, retain joint family arrangements even as they work together to control some of the country's largest financial empires. Psychologically, family members feel an intense emotional interdependence with each other and the family as an almost organic unit. Ego boundaries are permeable to others in the family, and any notion of a separate self is often dominated by a sense of what psychoanalyst Alan Roland has termed a more inclusive "familial self." Interpersonal empathy, closeness, loyalty, and interdependency are all crucial to life within the family. http://countrystudies.us/india/83.htm http://www.indiaparenting.com/articles/data/art09_023.shtml http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-34377537,prtpage-1.cms There are joint families in India who number upto 100 members under one roof.