Nuclear physics
 
Question:
Avatar

What is the smallest subatomic particle?

By clyde crockett Asked Oct 7 2005 3:04PM
7
Pts
 
 
Rate Question
Answer Question Help someone!
Get the latest questions in Nuclear physics
flag

Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know.
Sign up now to ask a question or help someone else by giving an answer!

signup now
Sort answers by: Rating | DateArrow Down
 

Top Answer out of 11

by James Beatty on Oct 27, 2005 at 2:13 pm Permalink

Avatar
So we're all on the same page here, "size" doesn't really exist in the way we think of it on a quantum level. There is *no* experimentally verified radius for the electron or any of the quarks. As best we can tell, they are point particles, occupying no physical space. Neutrons and protons have "size", i.e. seem to occupy physical space, because they are quarks held together by the strong force, and so their "size" is simply the range at which the strong force interactions between the quarks dominate. So, the smallest subatomic particle doesn't exist, as subatomic particles don't really have a size.
23
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar xprofessor Apr, 22 2008 at 02:27 PM
Nice answer - max pts. This is what I've read -- that quarks and electrons are empirically point-like. Untested string theories, however, put a lower limit on particle size on the order of the Planck length, don't they?
Avatar Im Alec Nov, 17 2009 at 06:49 AM
I think the Uncertainty Principle puts a lower limit of the Planck length on anything. But that is so far below the limit of what we can detect so far that it is not relevant at the moment, not a long time in the future.

Answer 2 out of 11

by RedJohn on Oct 7, 2005 at 6:33 pm Permalink

Avatar
The smallest particle that I am aware of is the quark. The quark is the basic building block of hadrons. There are two types of hadrons: baryons (three quarks) and mesons (one quark, one antiquark). Protons and the neutrons are stable baryons.

There are also leptons, a family of elementary particles that include electrons, muons, tauons, and neutrinos. Neutrinos were originally believed to have zero mass, but they have been found to have a very tiny mass, smaller than any subatomic particle.

Calling someone a 'hadron head' would be considered an insult among physicists.
9
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar Milk Man Oct, 08 2005 at 06:36 AM
This was good too
Avatar MrNatural Abstractor of the Quintessence Aug, 30 2008 at 08:55 PM
I thought leptons were Irish particles that hide deep in the woods.

Answer 3 out of 11

by marc on Apr 22, 2008 at 2:14 pm Permalink

Avatar
My friend Cliff Stefanuk's biceps.
6
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar Chezter is going to save the Redheads Apr, 22 2008 at 02:28 PM
hahahaha You are going places here

Answer 4 out of 11

by uraseasquirt on Feb 12, 2008 at 7:45 pm Permalink

Avatar
a quark.
6
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 5 out of 11

by Roger Kovaciny on Oct 10, 2005 at 11:17 am Permalink

Avatar
What you probably have in mind is particles you can visualize, in which case a proton would be as good an answer as any. The electron, when acting as a particle, is the same size but 1837 times lighter; but the electron acts as a wave much of the time so it's harder to visualize. Many of the other subatomic particles, such as quarks and gluons, can hardly be visualized even by nuclear physicists, but as long as the equations balance, the concepts are useful.

The proton is 1/100,000th the diameter of an atom, and the atom is unimaginably small. Think of it this way: You have 50 trillion cells in your body. Of the needed elements in each cell, cobalt is present one hundred millionth as often as other elements, and only as part of the huge Vitamin B-12 molecule. And yet there are 450,000 atoms of cobalt in the average cell!

The human body is like an onion. Every time you think you get to the bottom layer, there's another layer to be investigated.
4
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar TulsaDavid Oct, 12 2005 at 12:26 PM
Your last line hit it. As our technology advances, we will undoubted find there is no limit to the subdivided particles.
Avatar Quirkie Nov, 28 2005 at 02:54 PM
In no way can a proton be considered to be the same size as an electron. A proton is a combination of three quarks.

Answer 6 out of 11

by Alatea on Oct 7, 2005 at 7:51 pm Permalink

Avatar
This answer was last edited on: Jan 28, 2006
University of Hawai'i at Manoa physicists recently reported the discovery of a new and unusual elementary particle. This particle, which they have dubbed the X(3872), weighs about the same as a single atom of helium and exists for only about one billionth of a trillionth of a second before it decays to other longer-lived more familiar particles. Although extremely short-lived by human standards, this is nearly an eternity for an elementary particle of this kind.

The new particle was discovered by UH Manoa Professor of Physics and Astronomy Stephen Olsen and Gyeongsang University (Korea) Professor Sookyung Choi among the decay products of the so-called beauty meson that is produced in large numbers at KEKB, a huge “atom smasher” at the High Energy Accelerator Research Laboratory in Tsukuba Science City, Japan.

“The discovery is very exciting because there are some indications that the X(3872) may be the first example of a new type of sub-atomic particle, one where two more ordinary particles attach to each other similar to the way atoms stick together to form molecules,” said Olsen. “If so, this is the first glimpse of a whole new realm of sub-atomic physics, with many new particles to discover and understand.”

Particles produced at KEKB are studied at the Belle Detector, a complex assortment of highly sensitive radiation detectors located inside of a very large super-conducting electromagnet. Faculty and students from UH Manoa regularly participate in an international consortium of researchers from 11 different countries that collaborated on the construction and operation of the Belle Detector. They also take turns helping to operate the equipment which runs continuously with only a short summer break for improvements. The device took nearly ten years to design and build and has been operating since 1999. Olsen and UH Manoa Professor of Physics and Astronomy Thomas Browder are leaders of the Belle team.

“Like a giant telescope with unprecedented light gathering power that allows astronomers to peer further and further into the cosmos, the Belle Detector and the KEKB accelerator have enabled us to penetrate previously hidden aspects of nature at the smallest sub-atomic scales,” said Browder. “As is often the case when the full power of a new experimental instrument is harnessed, big surprises are found. The discovery of the X(3872) particle is a good example of this.”

There are hundreds of elementary particles and the discovery of a new one is not unusual. However, the X(3872) particle is peculiar in that it does not easily fit into any known particle scheme. Olsen and Browder initially thought the new particle was a member of the charmonium family of particles, which are comprised of a charmed-quark and an anticharmed-quark held together by the "color" force, the most powerful force in nature. Many different charmonium particles have been found and their properties reflect the many different ways that these charmed-quark anticharmed-quark combinations can be accomplished. However, theoretical expectations for all possible charmonium particles are very well formulated and the mass and other features of the X(3872) do not match well to any of them.

http://www.hawaii.edu/cgi-bin/uhnews
Edit- jbitz34 - Read again, slowly.
4
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar Milk Man Oct, 08 2005 at 06:35 AM
I love this stuff!!! Whether this is true or not, its very fascinating!
Avatar jbitz34 Oct, 12 2005 at 03:17 PM
The fact that it is the size of a helium atom means it is NOT, as is asked for, the smallest subatomic particle.

Answer 7 out of 11

by enlightenduk on Oct 12, 2005 at 7:37 pm Permalink

Avatar
Well let me tell you what everything is made of... love. ;)
2
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar Sergio Dec, 23 2005 at 03:26 PM
si si good
Avatar Thorkster Sep, 29 2008 at 05:19 AM
"Love" :)!!= Attraction=The Quantum Strong(color)Force which is the strongest bonding force in the universe!!!

Answer 8 out of 11

by ben goneway on Nov 17, 2009 at 6:35 am Permalink

Avatar
love in christ
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 9 out of 11

by spike_x on May 12, 2008 at 5:27 pm Permalink

Avatar
A quark those are inside protons and electrons.
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 10 out of 11

by ademola odugbesi on Feb 12, 2008 at 7:43 pm Permalink

Avatar
eletron
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)


Add an Answer

What is the smallest subatomic particle?

How to write a good answer
Your answer:

Display answer in fixed-width font (good for tables or text diagrams)

Answers must adhere to our Terms of Use

To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. Use the Preview button at the bottom to verify.

You can edit your answer at any time.

Add Video Add Iimage


Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.