ANSWERS: 7
  • There was no wreckage. There was no plane. Whoever's doing or has done the professional analysis has made sure the public doesn't have access to it. All accident scenes leave clues. When there's no evidence of a plane it means there was no plane. Remember, if you’re an American it's not patriotic to even entertain the conspiracy theory. If you do entertain the theories presented you may discover how, why and by whom this particular act was carried out.
  • I know that a lot of people view the movie, "Loose Change 2" as conspiracy theory. Perhaps it is, but it does provide photos not generally seen by the public, statements of people involved in all levels of the investigation, engineers, architects, scientific analysis of the buildings, planes, fuels, building contents, how physics affects it all, and so much more that I can't remember it all. It makes a very good case for there being a set-up scenario in all cases on 911. I first viewed it as a skeptic. I have been trying to get back to skepticism but it isn't happening. See it and make up your own mind.
  • There are probably families that can tell you there was a plane that hit the Pentagon because their loved ones were in it.
  • There was no plane. The picture on the internet of a single crumpled piece of metal a few foot long on a neat green lawn is a fake. If a plane had hit the building there would have been pieces of wing, engines, wheels and fuselage all over the place, not to mention cases and seats of which there would have been several hundred in that plane. All those pieces would have been exploded outwards on impact, littering the lawn. Furthermore given the Pentagon is supposed to be the most secure building in the world, why is there no cctv footage of the incoming plane or any radar proof ?
  • There is no plane wreckage because the Pentagon was not hit by a plane. It was hit by a cruise missile, and the picture of the ONE and ONLY engine found at the scene, was only about 3 feet tall,like a missile's engine,and not about 9 feet tall,if it were indeed the type of plane they tell us it was.Planes have TWO engines,not just one.Missiles have only ONE engine. Cruise missiles,when in flight,look very similar to smaller aircraft,explaining the witnesses who saw a 'small plane' rather than a large one.
  • Oh ... my ... God! I can't believe anyone is actually STUPID enough to believe this shit! You dimbulbs wake up, smell the coffee, and get a frakin' LIFE! Jeeze!
  • I'm with Capt.Harley on this one.If there you dont believe an aircraft hit the pentagon then prove it.You cant.Video from a camera across from the pentagon shows an aircraft hitting the building.As stated in other answers here,the aircraft was full of fuel and traveling at maximum speed when it struck the pentagon.Therefore pieces of said aircraft would have either been completely destroyed or burned to a point of unrecognizable.Theories such as this only serve to point out some peoples ignorance or unwillingness to except the truth because of the horror of that day.

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy