ANSWERS: 100
  • i prefer circumcised men because i dont think people would like their man penis to have skin hanging off of it.
  • Opinions may vary, but this is mine. I prefer the circumcised penis. To me it looks sexier than an uncut one. Also, there are issues with hygiene with an uncut penis. -- Kate
  • Doesn't matter as long as he's not diseased and I can stand to look at the thing :)
  • I have no experience with "uncut" so any answer I would provide would not be fair. I love the penis that is attached to my husband which happens to be cut.
  • I have no personal experience with "uncut" penises, so I can't really state a preference.
  • I have experience with both and honestly have no preference.
  • It is the preference for the person I would find more important. Other than that I cannot state a preference for a penis I do not have the experience to make an informed judgement.
  • Cut -- for esthetics and hygiene.
  • A lot of women claim to not have a preference, but I am willing to admit I do.... I prefer uncut, natural....
  • circumsized, is cleaner women have less affections with someone who is circumsized then someone that is not and a circumsized guy is cleaneer over all
  • My women like me cut -- they say it looks german :)
  • It's not cleaner to be circumcised, since i would think that most people here live in countries where such things as water and soap exist in abundance. I recommend watching "Penn&Teller's Bullshit" on just that topic.
  • i think circumsized is better because its easy to keep clean eliminates infection in men and women getting infected
  • the one i got came snipped back... i have no say in the matter. i like who it's attached to.
  • i don't care, i am more concerned with who is attached to it.
  • one of my friends told me that most guys in europe are uncircumcised and that it was weird, but apparently it wasn't a deal breaker for her haha
  • Not sure...I've been circumcised since I was a couple of days old. Nothing to compare it to:)
  • I wish I was uncircumcised, I'd have more to feel with. I wasn't given a choice in the matter when I was a baby. Although I have heard from others on the internet, that some of them have difficulties with their extra forskin. I don't really know what it would be like.
  • I had no say in the matter but I once dated a nurse who came right out and asked me if I was or wasn't. When I responded in the affirmative she said "Good". I then asked her why and she said "several reasons but mainly because uncirmumcized looked gross". She later said that had I not been she probably would never had let things progress to the next level. I don't know how most women feel about it as she is the only one who ever discussed it. The subject just doesn't come up much. It might have been just a personal preference of hers.
  • I don't think it makes any difference. The only man I've slept with is my husband of 34 years and he's fine thank you. And no, it's not unclean or hard to keep clean or we're not both prone to infections. Neither of us have ever had problems and we're in our 50s. In this modern age with average normal bathing and there is no hygiene problem for either man or woman. If that was the case, people wouldn't have survived and may have gone extinct.
  • Mine's still got his hood and I'll tell you what, He's a good lookin willy. And I don't think it's not gonna to affect peformance, It still feels gooooooood.
  • y on earth do u care what women prefer ?
  • I would love to get circumcised but I keep asking my wife and she does not get round to organising it.
  • Circumcised. Hands down. I don't know why, though. Aesthetics, I suppose.
  • Definetly uncut, i've been with both with about the same size penises and uncut does something magical for me everytime - guaranteed without even trying - oh gosh just thinking about it makes me weak at the knees !! I'm single now, & i would prefere a man that is uncut, but how on earth do you ask someone 'that', you only first meet? haha... (Sorry if that's too much information) And if your a man who is uncut that stress's about it - DONT - there should be more of you....
  • I have no preference,and it doesnt make a difference in bed department,its not what youv got,its how you use it ;)
  • Either, as long as he keeps himself clean. But I will say that from a strictly visual point of view, cut *looks* nicer. But visuals really aren't that important when it comes to genitalia, because you don't have eyes in your orifices. ^_^
  • it really doesnt make a difference to me.
  • Circumcised for me! It tends to be cleaner and I personally think it looks nicer.
  • Uncircumcised seems to be more sensitive, which can be good or bad:) But it makes no difference if the man himself is sensitive!
  • cut, i hate foreskin, besides its so much cleaner that way - erch, cock cheese!
  • I don't want any man of mine to be unnatural, no little snippy snippy! And from research I've done, sex is much better with than without.
  • My husband was circumcized soon after birth. His is the only penis I have experience with and hope to have experience with. Unless he can find a foreskin on Ebay for sale, I will have to just be content with his surgically altered penis head.
  • I don't care about the man I'm with... There's nothing I can change about it anyway. (It won't grow back, and TRY telling a man to get circumsized as an adult! HA!) As for any boys I may have, they never will be. It's an unneccessarty surgery for an infant (regardless of how safe it may be).
  • I prefer circumsized, it's more clean and pretty :) my opinion
  • Circumcised right above the balls works for me. JUST KIDDING!!!!
  • definitely circumcised, way more attractive to me
  • Definately uncut. God made men that way for a reason!!!!! I don't know if there's a differance; but it's one of the first things I ask a guy when we start seeing each other.
  • I prefer circumcised, maybe because it's what I am accustomed to.
  • A difference in what way?
  • I like 'em natural. It feels better. I have had both, and admit I am dissapointed if my bf is cut.
  • I prefer a natural, uncut man, and yes, it can sometimes make a HUGE difference. I have been with both, and like another girl said, of comparable length/width (because that has to be taken into account), and the natural intact penis is just that, natural. It's the way our bodies are meant to fit together. I find being with a circumcised person disappointing and also, that scar is a little sad. Most men were not given the choice, which I think is inhumane. Other than fundamentalist religious countries, America is one of the few places that still allows male genital mutilation, which is exactly what circumcision is. It not only takes away a very important, erogenous part of a man's body without his consent, but it causes unecessary pain to a newborn perfectly healthy child, and will most likely affect his sex life permanently as an adult, whether or not he is aware of what he has lost or not. His experience can never be the same as a man who did not have part of his genitalia removed, and that is a scientific fact.
  • circumcised.
  • Peter is peter. As long as it's clean I could care less. My husband happens to be circumcized.
  • Umm . . . you're obviously seeking the women's perspective here, but if you're interested in the male view, well, here's mine. All in all, being circumcised makes virtually NO DIFFERENCE, and I can speak to this with some authority. Unlike most of my contemporaries who were routinely circ'ed at birth, I spent 53 years in the natural state. I was somewhat attached to my foreskin (pun intended) and reluctant to give it up, even in deference to my wife's wishes. Last year, however, I finally agreed to go under the urologist's knife. I was initally apprehensive, largely because I'd read so much about decreased sexual sensation in men circ'ed as adults. My fears, I'm pleased to report were unfounded. Seven months post-op, intercourse is more enjoyable than ever. With no foreskin to get in the way, my glans experiences friction with the vaginal wall going both directions, both in and out. Since the operation, I also seem to have significantly increased staying power! The downsides? Well, the surgeon removed part of my frenulum along with my foreskin, and I kind of miss the erogenous sensation it provided. Also, becasue I was circumcised quite tightly, masturbation now requires the use of a lubricant . . but it's a small price to pay for overall increased satisfaction and improved appearance. My wife is happy, and so am I.
  • What makes the diff. as long as your gettin it?
  • At this point, I really don't have much of a choice:)
  • Circumsized. I don't like cheese on my hot dog.
  • Is this a female or male question?
  • There is nothing really wrong with a circumcised penis, it it wasn't done too tight or otherwise botched. It's also easier to slip a condom on. Uncut should be washed first, and it is more essential to use it with a condom, even if one is trickier to put on. That said, for an American woman to be intimate with an intact penis is a Walk on the Wild Side, a Taste of the Forbidden. The foreskin is a bit feminine, reminding me of my clit and inner lips. The uncut penis is just out and out lewder. Girl, you have not truly lived until you have pulled the pants down on an intact guy, reached for his limp penis, gently moved his foreskin up and down, and watch that penis stand at attention. Keep massaging that foreskin with your fingers until the precum pours out. Then spread it around with your index finger. Meanwhile, have him massage your clit so you both get juicy at about the same time. Then have him enter you slowly and gently. Notice I've left the condom out. That means that this game is reserved for married couples...
  • My fiancee is uncut and I LOVE IT!
  • I prefer them circumcized. But have had both
  • i definitely prefer circumcised, so does every woman I have ever talked to.
  • Circumcised, I have never experienced a uncircumcised weenie lol so I think it would be weird.
  • It's good to see that there are more women than I thought that prefer uncircumcised guys.
  • I prefer uncut. It makes a difference to me, only a slight one in feel, but it is better. I find the foreskin erotic and attractive-looking though and it makes it far easier to masturbate the guy. I just find the cut look rather a turn-off. However, I'm from the UK where circumcision is rare. I find the idea of routine circumcision quite odd.
  • It makes no difference at all, I've had both and I have no preference. They both have benefits and as long as your guy is clean there is no problem.
  • UNcircumcised, I find circumcised a turn off - I don't like the surgically altered look and it is far easier to masturbate an uncircumcised man. I far prefer performing oral sex on an uncut man too - I like the feel of the foreskin.
  • I prefer circumcised men, yes if it's health issue, cleaner nicer to look at, but of course I wouldn't know until I actually see the guy naked. I just hope he is but if not love rules.
  • It is no skin off my nose!
  • Speaking as a guy...right out of the womb: circumcized, as I was. Later on, when infection may have required it? My butt's little "rose bud" just curled at the thought! I'm a big whooz!
  • circumcised is my choice. I think it is cleaner and makes men's junk look better, TO ME anyway. However, I have gone out with men that were not circumcised, and there was no difference during the "sweat" times. ;-)
  • Uncircumcised feels so much better!
  • Aesthetic considerations aside, being circumcised is definitley better --and I can speak to this with some authority. I was uncut for 53 years and only joined the circumcised world one year ago today. Now, it needs to be noted that an uncirc'ed penis is exquisitely sensitive, since it contains more erouengous nerve endings. However, exquisite sensitivity isn't necessarity a good thing, particularly if you're interested in prolonging intercourse or satisfying your partner. Since circumcision, my glans (and what remains of my frenulum) are, indeed, less sensitive. The trade-off, however, is that my staying power is vastly increased. I now have the control to delay orgasm until I'm ready to orgasm. Perviously, things just sort of happened on their own -- frequently after only a three or so minutes of thrusting. Now it needs to be noted that masturbation without my foreskin is somewhat more difficult -- but that is easily remidied with the liberal use of a water-based lubricant. Hope this helps.
  • They're both good. The important thing is the man it's attached to.
  • uncircumcised. i just think its easier to work with. and i've had both.
  • I prefer circumcised
  • both are beautiful creationz
  • I have only seen 1 uncircumcised one and my hubby was circumsized. I don't have much esperience with the uncircumsized so I really can't say that they are bad or anything. I do like circumsized though!
  • Cut, most dudes who are uncut "forget" about the joys of smegma.
  • My preference goes towards UNcircumcised. But penises of both variety are wonderful in their own way
  • first time i saw an uncircumsized penis i nearly freaked out-it looked very different- it was only last year.. .(-I didnt let the guy know, though) i prefer circumsized, and that's for health reasons, too.
  • I'm bi and uncut - and I prefer uncut. If you have never had an uncut cock, then you don't know what you are missing! Yes, it takes more work to keep it clean, but that velvet soft foreskin affords so many more pleasures. There are so many things that can be done with it, not the least is taking your precum lubed finger and slipping a finger or two in under the foreskin ( before it is pulled back revealing the helmet ) and woking them around and around the swoolen head. This can also be done with your tongue - wow! That does feel great for both people! Sliding fingers or tongue under the forekin is a wonderful experience - My wife likes to slip her tongue under Mine and swirl it around My cock head.. The foreskin is amazingly stretchable and do soft and silky to the fingers and the tongue and mouth.. it can easily be pierced and a small ring placed in it with minimal trouble or pain - and the ladies say that the extra feeling of the ring inside them is something else! Also, for the "ring bearer", fucking with a pierced foreskin is wild as long as it isn't too tight or anal. That ring makes a wonderful place to attach a leash to for your pet if you are into the D/s and B&D scene.. or even a little bell when he is serving you and your lover as your cuck.. the extra benefits of a foreskin are limited only by your imagination - I would never think of having Mine removed and guys who don't have one wil never know what they are missing. Hopefully, this gave someone some new ideas..*grins* If so, I'd like to hear about them.
  • I was never circumcised, but I have no foreskin. What do you gals think about that?
  • im uncut and although for a long time i was self concious about it, by reading the answers and discussions on here, it makes me feel like im not alone. ive had numerous girlfriends and sexual partners and not one has ever said anything about me being uncut. I guess it all depends on how good the user is with it.
  • is ur penis bigger if its uncut?
  • I think so, but I'm just use to it. Most guys in America circumcised
  • I went 2 a mental hospital because of a severe trip out when i learned all of my foreskin's purposes , I am convinced that I will never have a full orgasm Also when i was younger i would hear many jokes about how women never achieve orgasm during sex , well if her partner is circumcised and he is not receiving the correct sensory reactions how can his body flow be true to the act And another thing Irration of the tip of my penis is very great masturbation is not fun My temper explodes everytime i feel pain at my mushroom tip And i was over circumcised i found this out later and is one of the reasons of my short penis , the other was a fat pad i think my penis got scared after it got cut and decided 2 rest inside of me for the rest of its life
  • As an uncut guy, my answeron this issue is obvious. I don't like the look of men's, to me, mutilated penises if I see one in the gym shower, whereas I think my natural one looks perfect! The real test for the man is what do women think. My experience having intercourse has always been totally postive. As for the sensations I get, how do I compare them with ohter's? I know that to come I don't have to work at it or thrust like a jack hammer, I just more like move my whole body back and forth smoothly, rhythmically, slowly, think or feel my foreskin bunching and stretching as I thrust. I think that is what drives my woman crazy. That has to be the way nature intended intercourse to go.
  • I personally like circumcised. That's what I'm use to. I don't think, when they are hard, that it makes a difference, but when they are limp, they LOOK different. Also giving oral to a limp uncircumcised dick feels weird
  • I think it's hilarious when women make the statement: "it's cleaner and looks better". Cut or uncut it's a damn site easier to clean than an open wound that bleeds between your legs. And cut or uncut it doesn't look like a bulldogs face covered in mayonaise or pulling apart a grilled cheese sandwich. Don't get me wrong ladies I love mayonaise.
  • Never had either, but i prefer the looks of a circumcised one over uncut. NO offense to anyone, but cut looks healthier and cleaner to me. I just think it looks weird and a bit creepy with the foreskin..sorry. Everyone has there own thoughts about it, nothing wrong with that :) I just rather him be circumcised.
  • Makes no differencde at all to me cause once im in that bedroom mit my fellow my glasses are off and i cant see a dam thing he guides he around the room lol and certainlty to his lovely long penis
  • How can a foreskin make a difference to sex? You cant have sex when your penis is covered with foreskin. So the whole discussion is pointless.
  • I honestly don't care, but I do favour uncircumcised! XD
  • I'm circ's latest recruit & let me tell you having experienced only the un-circ for many a year until recently, the verdict is most definitely....CIRC. I hear all your comments about au natural etc etc, but c'mon girls you can't deny, that loose skin aka flappy shit is just disgusting, no ??? If you haven't been privledged enough to try the alternative then how could you possibly compare. On the hygiene front, there's no hiding place for unwanted junk on a circ. Since becoming a member of the circ club i have a new moto, "if you've got skin, you're not coming in".
  • my cock in uncut and doesn't smelllll at all.i wash it all the time in the shower. pull the skin back alll the way and scrubbbbbbbb. no smell at all. ill get out and touch my head and smell it and it smells like axe gel. haha and i dont think girls wud like it if we cut yer clits of or labia. see how u like it.
  • Well I'm uncircumcised and I've never had a complaint so I wouldn't change it for the world.
  • ---------> it a lot cleaner than a guys who are not circumcised some of the feeling is lost by doing it but i do think it much better in all ways
  • I like them circumsized, I think they are ugly when not,actually never was with anyone not cut, just seen pics
  • No, natural is better. Natural feels better for intercourse, and is far more fun and erotic to play with. IMHO, natural looks far better and has better aesthetics too. Circumcised looks kind of weird to me. I'm from the UK, where circumcision is comparatively rare, but I've actually had several circumcised boyfriend's partners, as well as the uncircumcised ones. I'd choose natural any day. Thank God for foreskins.
  • I definitely prefer it cut. Not only does it make it look so much nicer, but it feels better when you're being penetrated and you don't have to contend with a foreskin!
  • I got a un-cut penis and it's a relief there are more girls that like un-cut over cut!!!
  • I'm from the US but have been lucky enough to have had an unusually high amount of un-cut partners. Their skills in the bedroom are notably superior in every way. Even uncircumcised guys with small dicks are vastly better than circumcised guys with big ones. They are certainly better at feeling, which, in turn, makes it easier for them to please me beacuse they can feel the spots that make me cum. They also tend to be better able to control how long they last. The difference between the two is so extreme I honestly think circumcision should be illegal. Why hinder good sex? Additionally, if the guy showers once a day and cleans his dick off, it won't be dirty. I have never had an issue of cleanliness with any of my uncut boyfriends, probably because they showered regularly.
  • If my Husband wasn't circumsized, I would like it very much, the same way I do now. (Circumsized). I like him the way he is because he is him.
  • Well I'm glad I found this. I'm 25 and have always been trying to hide my penis. I'm happy with my size, 9 to 9.5....but I always tried to hide it for another reason--I always thought girls thought it was gross to have your "hood"
  • I like 'em circumsized. Clean, smooth and powerful...yum.
  • uncut smells, its not cleaned properly and its ugly
  • Neither, I prefer my wife.
  • I propose 4 types of answers. A. I will not be intimate with an uncircumcised man. B. I prefer circumcised, but am open to intimacy with an intact partner. C. I don't care, or I haven't noticed the difference. Moreover, all penises I interact with are erect, in which case there is little difference in appearance. D. I prefer uncircumcised. D includes young American women who have had many cut lovers and a few uncut ones, and who say that their experiences with the latter were turning points in their sexual self-discovery.

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy