That would be the least vulgar thing I would call him.

And before you down rate me for that, I am also a conservative.

Among other things.

Question: Is the link supposed to have something to do with Rush? Because I couldn't see a connection. Interesting story, though.

EDIT: Ah, fixed now, then. Yes, it seems he is a hypocrite, as well. My father is a fan. I am not. Thank you for the article, Keithold, I stay more informed because of your questions!

I would have to say yes.

I am most amused at the part where the cast iron frying pan complains about a pot calling a kettle black.
.
As for 'But the tactics of Limbaugh, Palin, Cheney & Fille are more cynical: They spin certainty, ignoring their side’s screw-ups, and they exploit patriotism, labeling all critics as traitors,' well, I guess what goes around comes around.
.
I like Dowd, she's been well-blessed by the snark fairy and she's far more entertaining than Rush. But I recommend looking elsewhere for a rational assessment of Limbaugh.
.
To the question, finally...sure. He is. So is our current President. Of the two, Obama is in the position to do the most harm.

#$%! Rush Limbaugh.

Is this a game of nice things to call Rush Limbaugh?

Great article link.

I'd write what I really think of Limbaugh, but what's the point? It would either make his head bigger, or affect his ego, and then he'd need more pills, and then where would his maid be?

Of course. Just about all political commentators are self-centered egotistical talking heads. I say "just about" to cover my bases. I can't think of one who does not fit the description, but there may be one or two out there...