- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Yes he does for what little impact he had on ending the cold war, what ended the cold war was nothing more or less than the Soviet Union was bankrupt... really its that simple
He gets far too much credit.
Someone once said "Reagan taking credit for ending the Cold War is like the rooster taking credit for the dawn".
The CIA knew by the late 1960s that the Soviet Union would eventually collapse.
All the Neo-Con/Military-Industrial Complex spending did since then is ensure that the United States went bankrupt second.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team_B
http://archive.peacemagazine.org/v02n6p40b.htm
http://www.truthandpolitics.org/military-relative-size.php
.
.
.

Yeah, he just happened to be President of the United States when the Berlin wall came down. Hindsight has shown that Reagan's actions were contradictory. In those circumstances where a rigid ideological approach would have debased American interests, Reagan showed pragmatic beliefs. However, when he started confronting the weakening Soviet states, he performed as an ideologue and because of that, his anticommunism rap could finally be aired without risk to national security. Despite what his adherents believe about him, Reagan had no consistent ideological forethought to ending the Cold War. Good question. +5
This is what I remember about Ron Reagan...as Governor of California he personally cut education off at the knees. That is his legacy for me. Anti-education, anti-intellect, anti-growth, anti-progress. Happy Tuesday keithold! :)
He had little to do with ending the cold war.
He gets a lot of credit from the SCLM for ending it, and it is about 5,000 times more than he deserves.
From my understanding of history, he gets far more credit than he deserves.
I'm not sure the Cold War has ended.
No he doesn't. The liberal media has always underrated Reagan.
It was an event that would have come with or with out him. The governments of the world were heading towards globalization along time ago.By hiring an actor the US showed the world that they can get masses of people to buy into pretty much anything.
No, but he will in time.
He also did a lot to feed into it as well.
So if his spending like a Credit Card Republican solved the "cold war" then why did so many Republicans not stop spending like a bunch of drunken democrats?
no the global economy !
A better question would be, "Does he deserve the credit he gets?"
The Soviet Union may very well have collapsed on it's own. They were in trouble economically before Reagan was ever elected. I do, however, think the arms race that Reagan engaged them in helped speed up their demise. Reagan may have put the final nail in the coffin, but he certainly didn't build that coffin. History has given him more than enough credit.
I have to agree with the consensus here. He was a good leader yes. But, at best, he only helped the impending collapse occur sooner.
Reagan was a great chief executive,leader,we sure could use a pres.like him again.
Why was Ronald Reagan so accommodating to the Mormons?
by Mister_Bromide on July 28th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
who was better Ronald Regan or Theodor Rosevelt (please supply facts and please don't answer with bias)
by waismartialarts on November 12th, 2011
| 3 people like this
Did Ronald Reagan ever paint?
by howmuch4me on May 29th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Which states have Ronald Reagan days?
by Halliburton Shill on July 31st, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Do you think Ronald Reagan, The Great Communicator, would be on Twitter all day?
by Mister_Bromide on July 28th, 2011
| 2 people like this
You're reading Does Ronald Reagan get the credit he deserves for his role in ending the Cold War?
Comments
Thanks buxtonite. It was definitely a factor.
by keithold is a prodigal bagger on November 2nd, 2009
my pleasure as always!
by buxtonite ..slowly losing my mind on November 3rd, 2009