by brendan on March 26th, 2007

brendan

Question

Help answer this question below.

In England in the 1960's, should a 10 year old boy have spanked on his bare bottom with a leather paddle accross his mother's knee, in front of his female teacher, that he was rude and cheeky to.

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 20 helpful answers below.

  • by -O-uknow on June 3rd, 2007

    -O-uknow

    An ass whippin is sometimes good for the soul..not to mention attitude in any era :)

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • By the standards of the day, it was probably a bit excessive, but not totally unacceptable.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by FanoBliv on March 30th, 2010

    FanoBliv

    It prolly worked is all I can say.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Thriftymaid on August 23rd, 2009

    Thriftymaid

    I don't think that is acceptable in any decade.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by baddbuoy on August 23rd, 2009

    baddbuoy

    That's a classic 'spanking story' scenario. And of course, the ritual is deliberately drawn out to maximize the shaming of the naughty boy...the teacher watching closely as his pants are taken down, and then never taking her eyes off his nicely rounded, jiggly backside while his mother paddles it pink across her knee. No question he's getting the punishment he deserves.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by DannyJ on June 3rd, 2007

    DannyJ

    I don't see why not. I bet he was never cheeky to that teacher again.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Halskiisaklink on March 26th, 2007

    Halskiisaklink

    He probably went to a Catholic school...

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by singwell-is off researching a lot on March 26th, 2007

    singwell-is off researching a lot

    I'm sure it happened.Attitudes to discipline were quite different in the past than they are today.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Anon on March 26th, 2007

    Anon

    I don't care when it was, a child should never be hit!

    • Like
    • Report

    4 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by debodun on August 23rd, 2009

    debodun

    He was cheeky to his teacher twice, then.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Ain-EST on August 23rd, 2009

    Ain-EST

    Only a moron and a bad parent would think that beating their children would serve them well.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on June 3rd, 2007

    Anonymous

    That sort of thing could have happened, though it is slightly more likely that the father was the disciplinarian for a child of this age. The implement of choice could have been anything from a leather strop (used for sharpening a razor) or a leather belt to an electric cord or wooden spoon. A kid of ten would probably have been positioned against something - a desk or a table etc - for the spanking, as he would be quite heavy for his mother to support in her lap. The description you've used - spanking across mother's knee while a woman looks on, sounds somewhat like a sexual fantasy rather than an actually occurrance, though, because of the inclusion of that humiliation factor. Of course, it could have happened. Discipline was a lot harsher forty odd years ago.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by ChuckExAnon on January 14th, 2011

    ChuckExAnon

    The kid's now somewhere in his 50's-60's. How'd he turn out?

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Jonathan on January 14th, 2011

    Jonathan

    Seriously, that is F'n sick - child abuse really. Children should never be hit. Have a good one, Jonathan

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by ABEL LEWIS on January 14th, 2011

    ABEL LEWIS

    Yes the 10 years old boy should get a Spanking on his Bare Bottom with a Wooden Paddle.

    Until his butt is BRIGHT RED. It's Discipline.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by carsrus on January 19th, 2011

    carsrus

    U bet it was ok! That was in the 60's, where I live my sons school still uses paddles on bad boys! And if I find out, I use my belt or strap!

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by paddle Scott 100 on March 15th, 2011

    paddle Scott 100

    Did you have that teacher too.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Jade on June 3rd, 2007

    Jade

    no..spanking is one thing but being humiliated in that fashion is going just a bit too far. And bare bottom spanking shouldn't be done either. A swat on a fully clothed bottom with the hand is what I consider a spanking. The hand is usually hurt a lot more than the bottom.

  • by Anonymous on April 14th, 2011

    Anonymous

    Ok well I believe that was approiate.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on October 23rd, 2008

    Anonymous

    Would like to hear/read the whole story.

    If the teacher was the only witness then absolutely OK.

    When I was in grammar school in the 1950's spanking was on bare bottom but in the coat room. Just you and the teacher, almost all nuns.

    Only serious or repeat offenses were spanked in front of the entire class on the bare bottom. Maybe 1 or 2 or none a year.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading In England in the 1960's, should a 10 year old boy have spanked on his bare bottom with a leather paddle accross his mother's knee, in front of his female teacher, that he was rude and cheeky to.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

England in 1960s
England 1960s
Spanking in the 1960 s
England in the 1960 s
Spanking 1960