- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Where is the Colossus of Rhodes located today?
by Answerbag Staff on July 14th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Can a U.S. citizen be deported due to marriage fraud?
by Answerbag Staff on July 2nd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What does it mean to approve a deportation?
by Answerbag Staff on June 30th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
I am legally married to an illegal in the U.S.A. he is currently in deportation proceedings. I am going before immigration judge in 2 days
by heather.agustin on September 14th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
I am a U.S.citizen w/permanent residence status in Canada.being deported from Canada. what will happen when i get to the u.s. border
by zookmatthews on May 20th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading If you could snap your fingers and magically every illegal alien would be gone from the entire USA what do imagine would happen the next day?
Comments
That sounds like a good plan Strong but do we not also need to control our borders as well? If we make all who are here magically legal and eligible for all that encompasses will the flood not grow exponentially?
by Cowboy-Matter of Fact on September 30th, 2007
Definitely control our borders; while admitting new legal immigrants. We'll shrivel and dry up without them.
by George Dufferin on October 1st, 2007
Since when is an out of control rate of overpopulation a good thing either economically or otherwise?
by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on March 10th, 2008
Capt jack: Any industrialized country whose population does not increase is in danger of economic collapse. The birthrate must exceed the death rate for countries to continue to prosper. This is very basic economics.
.
Every Western European country and Japan are losing population. Any birthrate of less than 2 (actually 2.1) per female cause a reduction in population. Italy is in the worst shape as far as birthrate is concerned, but the others are also losing population.
.
Immigration is a necessity.
.
The same is not true for agricultural societies.
which we ain't.
by Knock on June 29th, 2008
I'm sorry that the facts above annoyed someone so much that he or she felt it necessary to anonymously D/R; but it is hard for many people to accept facts. They would rather persist in their own beliefs based on the opinions of their friends.
by Stronghart on October 28th, 2008
We've been letting this problem fester for well on 40 years or more till it's gotten completely out of control.
I am ALL for legal immigration that this country is founded on, but THAT is NOT the issue.
There is a laundry list of things that are leading to the collapse of America.
One is the corrupt government of Mexico itself going to extremes to push it's poverty stricken on us. One way is pamphlets printed in Spanish that give helpful hints on how to sneak across and avoid detection in coming to the "promised land".
.
Another big factor in this is this sickening feeling of entitlement that is growing so rampant in the U.S. so this "industrialized country" Knock speaks of is losing it's industry to countries that can compete with workers who don't demand as high of wages or benifits.
Add to that that jobs here are being lost at an alarming rate by big corporations and companies that want to increase their profit margins by hiring illegal immigrants that they can pay less and not ...
by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on October 29th, 2008
..have tax records for, thus stuffing their greedy little pockets at the cost of hurting our countries economic development overall.
by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on October 29th, 2008
saying that it will hurt your countries economic developement brings in a completely different discussion between keynesian and classical economists, I'm pretty sure you'd have an increase of your economy to some extent due to lower costs which allows the firms to produce more etc etc etc. That this comes with inequity is the obvious downside... that employees would have less income and would therefore negatively shift aggregate demand and is worth the lower cost is the decade old discussion between keynesian and classical economists
by Sportsfanatic on November 5th, 2009
Cap't Jack: None of the comments I have made on this subject for various iriterations of the question have ever asserted that we needed cheap labor.
-
My point regarding underpopulation and a declining birthrate is related to the way in which social security works in most industrialized countries. The younger workers pay for the retired workers. When FDR set up the social security program thee were 14 workers for each retiree and life expectancy for men was 65. As you know that has changed.
If there are fewer younger workers then the cost of retirement payments becomes onerous. It's happening in all industrialized countries. the country affected most is Japan because of their rigid, uncompromising immigration policy. In fact, they have been relaxing that policy for the past few years..
by Knock on November 5th, 2009
If there were more ppl out there like CaptainJack
then us legal citizens wouldn't have to wait around
4 an unemployment check. Go Jack, u really r a smart
Captain!
by Bellesmom30 on March 22nd, 2010
But they're not new taxpayers if all they're going to do is pick apples their entire lives. They'll be just more welfare recipients.
by on June 13th, 2010
Knock: Immigration is good and helps economies to prosper.
Illegal Immigration does not.
Illegal Immigration sucks money out of economies, hurts employment of legal citizens, and causes violence and crime to spike.
And Strong- legalizing illegal immigrants would be disastrous, and extremely unfair to those who are actually waiting in line to get in the legal way.
by Matthew on August 8th, 2010
I don't discriminate against illegal aliens, but I've worked w/some who are very territorial, and fight over jobs; eliminating Americans from jobs, and replacing them w/their family members. If they are going to work in America they shouldn't try to take Americans out of jobs to replace them w/more family members they bring from their country. Americans need jobs. Not all illegal aliens are the same, some open their own business, and perhaps employ one or two Americans, but some use their businesses as cover up and are trafficking drugs into our country. These kind of immigrants give a bad reputation to other immigrants who respect America. Some drain the system, have 10 kids, while their boyfriends, uncles, brothers, etc live under the same roof working construction jobs that pay them &700-$800.00 wk. I've never made that amt of money in my life. It's not fair to neglect Americans, to take care of non-American citizens first. I say protect our borders, keep the immigrants that are already citizens, and teach these countries how to live the American dream in their land. Most immigrants love their country, but find America has more opportunity for them, and their families, therefore; we are now over populated, the un-employment rate is at it's highest. Some create daunting gangs even in our public schools, and place of employment to taunt ppl out of their jobs. Is this what we want for America? Again, I don't discriminate, but speak from personal experience. Keep the ppl that are already citizens protect our borders please. I not very academically educated, but it's pretty obvious America is no longer what it used to be due to these un-foreseen problems.
by Tired40 on May 3rd, 2011
in your question you talk about 'illegal' immigrants, in your response (to your own question) you make no mention of the word illegal. this tells me that you are trying to mince words to make your point. you have defeated your own argument. you lost.
by TonieMoral on June 2nd, 2011
Why Immigration Won't Fix Social Security
By Megan McArdle
Sep 30 2011, 11:51 AM ET
Periodically in some debate over social security and entitlements, someone will suggest that we simply throw open the immigration doors and let young, fresh immigrants come in and rebuild the bottom of the Ponzi scheme pyramid. I used to think this was a good idea, but (while I remain in favor of more open immigration), I'm not sure it will work, for the reasons outlined below:
1. The places that send us immigrants aren't having so many kids. Phillip Longman has a piece in the new issue of Foreign Policy which points out how dramatic a demographic transition the world is undergoing:
Indeed, the U.N. projects that by 2025, the population of children under 5, already in steep decline in most developed countries, will be falling globally -- and that's even after assuming a substantial rebound in birth rates in the developing world. A gray tsunami will be sweeping the planet.
. . . Because of the phenomenon of hyper-aging in the developing world, another great variable is already changing as well: migration. In Mexico, for example, the population of children age 4 and under was 434,000 less in 2010 than it was in 1996. The result? The demographic momentum that fueled huge flows of Mexican migration to the United States has waned, and will wane much more in the future. Already, the net flow of illegal Mexican immigration northward has slowed to a trickle. With fewer children to support and not yet burdened by a huge surge of elders, the Mexican economy is doing much better than in the past, giving people less reason to leave. By 2025, young people on both sides of the border may struggle to understand why their parents' generation built this huge fence.
Even if we wanted to go this route, it would probably be at best a stopgap.
2. The workers who most want to come aren't the same as the workers who are already here. Social Security does not just depend on the existing pool of workers; it depends on their output. You cannot keep the pyramid going by replacing each retiring public accountant with 1.5 cleaning ladies and carpenters. While there are certainly lots of highly skilled immigrants who want to come here, it's far from clear that the math works for social security. To be clear, that's not a brief against letting lower-skilled workers come in; they are a valuable complement to higher-skilled workers. But they cannot en masse shore up social security's finances, especially since they too will eventually collect it--and social security's benefit structure is progressive.
3. America's capital is cultural as much as financial and physical. We cannot bring in so many immigrants that we swamp the institutional structures: trust, rule of law, common norms about commercial behavior--that make us wealthy. I think that America can absorb more immigrants than it does--and should. But I am skeptical that it can absorb enough to keep the pyramid going.
4. An aging America is one that is going to be politically resistant to change. Immigrants change things. Therefore, politically this solution is going to be very tricky. Which probably makes my other three points irrelevant.
by Stronghart on September 30th, 2011
From an economic standpoint: an ever increasing population or even an increasing population for that matter is only a positive thing in a true and free competitive market (which we don't have) and even if we did we would need an industrial style economy (which we also don't have and never will again). Population growth is not a good thing at all in our current economy. You say we will have more consumers? living off transferred wealth! You say more taxpayers? Most immigrants pay in less than 10% but receive EIC and other tax benefits. I say secure the boarder, punish the employers who hire them and punish illegal immigrants here. If they want a better life for themselves, go back to their home country and overthrow the current government and socialize.
by Nassdec159 on April 20th, 2012