Considering that the House and Senate Majorities during the second half of the Bush Administration was Democrat, (they play a huge part in what goes on, don't forget) shouldn't they take some of the responsibility for this mess, not just Bush?
by 
druebeall
ANSWERS: 10
-
A bit yes. So you're admitting that Bu$h was ineffective?
-
I still find it odd that anyone can believe that anything in government is any one mans doing.
-
Democrats do not have responsibilities, only "entitlements".
-
YES!!! after all, they basically had to approve of everything that went down anyway. i think america should be paying the MOST attention to those elections rather than the presidential elections. after all, the house and senate have a lot more power.
-
The U.S. Public works in a hysterical mode or it doesn't act or react at all. They need to be stirred by whichever factions are the most vocal. Now it is the rich private insurance and health care lobbies. Yes the Democrats could have stopped Bush's policies and actions but it was better for them to let him continue to make bad decisions. It lead to their election of a Democratic President.
-
I'm pretty sure it was all Bush.
-
Considering that eight divided by two is 1/4, not 1/2, I'm not sure what you mean.
-
Its no different then any other presidency, when they screw the pooch, both parties are generally to blame. Its generally just easier for people to complain about the president and blame that guy.
-
That would only apply if they were taking credit for a good issue.
-
Of course thet spent like a drunken sailor and these idiots blamed Bush Mean while when CLinton was in office we saved money why?? Hmm oh yeah we had a republican House and senate...
Moongrim RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC