That is one damning discovery, of course being ignored in the mainstream news here in America.... I love when he says "You can't fudge this type of science" ha. nice! ty for sharing.

My opinion? My opinion is this is more conspiracy horsesh*t which doesn't weigh in with the whole picture. It's already been WELL established that those buildings were NOT brought down by the IMPACT of those airliners. And before anybody starts whining about these people using "impact" and what they mean by that, let me make it PERFECTLY CLEAR that if you are going to make a "technical" argument about some other course of action or sequence of events which could have brought down those towers, the need to be technically accurate in the language used is an absolute must! So using "impact" to describe the 'assumed' mode of destruction is deliberately misleading. It wasn't the impact...it was the structural weaknesses brought about by weakening the steal superstructure by the heat generated in the fires. WEAKENED steel...not MELTED steel. Such a material as "nano-thermitic" compounds were TOTALLY unnecessary to bring down those buildings under the circumstances which occurred with those airliners. Next thing people will be saying if this issue is ever pointed out as fraudulent will be the steel was embrittled by neutron bombardment by radioactive materials, I suppose. And, of course, all the evidence for this will be mysteriously missing since the debris has long since been hauled off. Or maybe corrosive biological agents or gases. Blah, blah, blah, blah...