ANSWERS: 14
-
Of course. Whenever I see those polls I wonder about all the unknown beauties out there that we'll never see. Also, that "93" would indicate they've checked out all the other hotties in the world. Yeah, right.
-
Nope, I'd say she rates higher.
-
Yeah she's right up there with Ruth Buzzy and Carol Burnette.
-
Yes it does. She's a reasonably attractive woman, but in the top 100 in the world? I don't think so.
-
Those lists are not to be taken at face value in the first place (of course you can't expect to rank all the women in the world) and are mostly made so people can agree or disagree and start discussions. Lists are always a popular feature for that reason.
-
no it seems a lot over the top.
-
Way, way, way over the top.
-
You could a few zeros after the 93 & still be overreaching.
-
I think that depends on how you rate hotness. Does power and being on the public eye have any effect on it? By looks alone, the woman's very pretty, but top 100 in the world? No. But take into account her station in life as the first lady, and everything else she does in the public eye and it may not be that out there...
-
yes...I've never found her all that attractive
-
It's not strange that she's on the list. The fact that there IS such a list, well, that's strange....
-
WAY way way over the top! The woman is down right ugly!
-
waaaay over the top
-
The selection comittee must be politicking. Just because she is in the news doesn't make her attractive. Michelle O is a regular looking lady, Smart but sorry not stunning.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 