I do not agree.

I very much agree.

Yeah, I agree your doctor is a moron.

Well...We all have both sex organs. But I believe it is a choice.

i think you may not want a physical or prostate exam from him.

I know that's not true, because I'm not at all bi-sexual. I think your doctor is trying to fuck you.

No i really dont agree at all. There is no basis for what your doctor is saying.

One of the "inventions" of Kinsey is the so-called Kinsey scale - a scale of 1 to 7 that describes one's sexual orientation. It's certainly a more accurate picture than just lumping everyone into pigeonholes of either gay or straight or exactly 50-50. In fact, in psychology straight is often described as "predominantly attracted to the opposite sex", and gay is "predominantly attracted to the same sex". That's because many or most people, while describing themselves as gay/straight can think of at least a few exceptions to that rule. As humans however we try to fit ourselves into the labels we give ourselves.

That's... Not really true at all. You are either, straight, bi, or gay.

No.

I think we are all bi, we just subconciously supress our gay tendancies because some of us feel it's "wrong"

Your doctor wants into your pants, he/she knows you're straight, but tells you this in the sad hope you'll believe it, which is very likely, since he/she'll be wearing a white coat, so they must be telling the truth, right?

I think your doctor is full of it

well i guess it depends on your definition of bi...if you feel that you find both sexes attractive then sure, I would agree that everybody has a hint of bi-ness. But, if its that everybody wants to get into both sexes pants...I would disagree.

I'm not really sure if I agree with you, or not. I do think that people are born that way bi, Gay, or straight, I don't think it is a choice, but that is my opinion.

I think so to a point. I guess it depends if you mean wanting to get into someones pants (of the same sex) or jsut finding them attactive. I'm straight with a long term boyfriend, but i still find some girls attractive, but don't wanna sleep with them or anything. Hope that made some sense, does in my head haha.

while i mat be Bi myself, i dont think every one has bi tendencies, that kind of theory has really not had much support for quite a while. I firmly believe sexuality is fixed for most people, and that many are purely one of the three orientations and nothing else.

What kind of doc said that? I really don't know....guess it's possible. +5

If we all were raised that way, it would be more acceptable, for sure.

yes we are.

I read an article in a science magazine it said that there is no clear cut boundaries when we define sexual orientation

yes, enough said.

I believe him. Only women get it up for me, but I'd rather see a huge 8" pulsing schlong plowing some chick in a porno than something like mine, or what normal guys have, much to our dismay. I've seen some pretty-boys I wouldn't mind experimenting with. Most of my pals say about the same thing.

Perhaps. Some people more than others. However, I am straight. Will only date guys, will only kiss a guy, and what not. But that does not mean females to me are ugly. I just wouldn't want to do anything with them like I would with a guy.

Well i guess, since we all go though experimental stages while we are teenagers so i guess.

Yes..i do believe that. :)

nou!. nononononononononononononononononono

Sure i think its true we all wonder at some point in our lives.

My understanding is that most people have same-sex sexual thoughts at one time or another in their lives but that these thoughts are not necessarily desires. . The problem is one of definition; thinking versus doing. . Sometimes when I'm standing in line at my bank I wonder how I would go about robbing it. I suspect I am not alone in this. If I went home and drew up a plan with some friends to rob my bank and the police found out about it we could probably be prosecuted for it, but until I actually step inside the bank and pull out a gun I'm not really a bank robber by any useful measure. Now I might really want to BE a bank robber, personally think of myself as a bank robber, possibly tell people I meet that I AM a bank robber. But that doesn't make me one. . By the way, I'm not trying to equate non-heterosexual sex with crime, my example is meant to illustrate the problem defining bi-sexuality.

I think that all people have the potential to swing both ways.

probably especially if you want to seperate sex and love.... I think carnal sex can be enjoyed either way...

Maybe. Id never go for a guy though thats for damn sure!!!! But i act and talk gay at times. NOT SERIOUS AT ALL!!!!! But its pretty funny i think. Im just an all around funny guy though lol

It has been proven that we all have a certain degree of bisexual in us.

No. Someone can't just assume everybody is like that because he/she does not know everybody.We are all unique not all bi

Nope.I don't agree.I'm not,but I totally respect those who are.My sister is a lesbian.*+++++*

It's probably true. Guys hero worship guys all the time (eg footballers, older guys at school). Then there is cameraderie amonst schooboys and soldiers etc. Whether this can be conisdered a very very very very very mild form of bisexuality (which needn't be taken to a physical sexual level) is for psychologists to answer!

yes i think so. nobody wants to watch porn with ugly people in it.

Did he say that right before he told you to remove your trousers?

Not really. But then, I don't agree with most people's idea of sexuality. I think a person's sexuality develops and changes over the course of their lifetime -- it especially develops in the early years, as all aspects of personality do (or so I believe), but it can change even when you're an adult. I don't think the strict divisions between gay, straight, bisexual aren't realistic ... at least, they don't represent my experience of reality. I do think some people will never experience homosexual desire, or heterosexual desire, (let alone sex acts), in their entire lives -- thus, they aren't bisexual. But most of us would fall in the murky "bisexual" category in that at one time or another, over the course of our lives, we likely experience sex with or sexual desire for members from both sexes. But the problem with the words "bisexual" and "homosexual" is they imply more than just sexual behaviour and/or feelings. They aren't just descriptive words: they're labels. They imply adherence to a particular socio-political sub-culture. They imply a lifestyle. And so, just because a person might have a homosexual experience with their best friend when they are 12, and continue now and then to find attractive certain members of their sex, it isn't necessarily true to call them "bisexual." For instance, I am a woman married to another woman, so most people would call me gay or a lesbian, and that's fine because it's basically true. But as a label, it doesn't mean much to me ... I feel like it doesn't apply, in a sense. I don't associate with any lesbian community. I don't have many gay friends -- none in my closest circle. I don't go to dyke bars. I don't even go to see the Pride Parade. I very rarely watch queer movies, read queer papers, or participate in queer discussion boards. I believe gay people deserve equal rights, but I'm not especially driven to be political active or speak out against injustice. It's not that I am ashamed of who I am -- it's just none of that stuff interests me. That culture and society just doesn't speak to me about me. And to me, all that stuff is wrapped up in the term "lesbian." Also, I've had sex with men and I am still attracted to men. So what am I? I don't mind when someone calls me gay or a lesbian, but I don't use these words, myself.

I do agree, to some degree... we all are (don't lie those of you who say "no I am not").

No, I am 100% attracted to men.

Yep, look at Andy Dick.

I do... most people just won't admit it....

i suspect so...

Yes, I believe everyone falls somewhere on the continuum from exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual with most falling somewhere in between such that the graph would look like a typical bell shaped curve if people were being completely honest with themselves.

As a female, I'm not in the least sexually repulsed by females. Conversely I'm not in the least sexually attracted to them either. So I'd disagree.

pfff! Your "doctor" reminds me of Dr Nick Riviera. "HI, EVERYBODY!!"

Shoot, I am! Holla

No, but I'll put my money on your doctor being bi-sexual to some degree.

I think there are still probably a few people who are totally gay or totally straight, but I think the majority are naturally bi to some degree or another.

I've heard the theory many times. Cobain put it in a song. Your doctor's a quack.