ANSWERS: 27
  • Creator one and only God
  • Both, God created the big bang :-)
  • There is evidence supporting the big bang theory, yet it's still a theory. There is absolutely no evidence for God of any kind anywhere, I don't believe there is a God.
  • God........Where the hell did the Big Bang come from?
  • The two are not mutually exclusive. You can believe in both quite easily. That said I don't. I don't believe in gods at all. As for the big bang well... I don't believe in that as such, it is just the best theory we have for now.
  • Big bang
  • more the big bang theory
  • What Creator?
  • Creator. This whole thing is far too complex to have been a happy accident of nature.
  • BIG BADDA BOOM BABY!!!!
  • Defenetly science. Big bang. doesn't everything have to be made with a bang
  • Creator. +5 Rollers Only And I will not respond to any anti-god or prove it comments
  • Both. Georges Lemaître (1894–1966), a Belgian Catholic priest and professor of physics and astronomy, proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre Here is a nice simple explanation of the Big Bang Theory which is currently the most accepted scientific theory of the origin of the universe: http://www.socyberty.com/Philosophy/The-Big-Bang-Theory-Simplified.212433 The Big Bang theory lends support to the idea of creation by God ex nihilo ("out of nothing"). In 1951, Pope Pius XII gave a speech before the Pontifical Academy of Sciences discussing the Big Bang theory: "…it would seem that present-day science, with one sweep back across the centuries, has succeeded in bearing witness to the august instant of the primordial Fiat Lux [Let there be Light], when along with matter, there burst forth from nothing a sea of light and radiation, and the elements split and churned and formed into millions of galaxies." Here is the entire address: http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius12/P12EXIST.HTM With love in Christ.
  • The creator, who could have initiated the big bang as well. The big bang, in my opinion, cannot exist without the creator of it since even in basic science you cannot have "something" become of "nothing" as it is a physical immpossibility. That first molecule that is the whole basis of the big bang had to have come from somewhere. It did not just magically appear.
  • I've read the Cat in The Hat, that doesn't mean it really happened. I don't expect a real conversation here, when christian panic they start quoting the bible and running for the hills becasue they can not think for themselves.
  • I read fine, and I comprehend, I just don't believe in Christianity. As far as what you believe in, I don't care, it makes no difference to me what you believe in. I believe that the existence of a God or Gods is absolutely unprovable. This is a fact not an opinion. Even you must agree. No evidence no way of ever knowing, period.
  • RollerzOnly, I see just fine. Just because someone wrote something down doesn't mean it's true, I've read the Cat in the Hat, that doesn't mean it actually happend. I'm not against your belief, I'm against your belief that you are right and everyone else is wrong. It doesn't matter to me if you believe in God, lots of people do. "Let's see if we're convinced in whatever it is that you believe in!" Okay, I believe that the existence of God, and and afterlife of any kind is absolutely unprovable. No one truly knows anything for sure. This is a fact not a belief.
  • Neither. Big bang is a theory. God is faith. There no proof of either of them.
  • Haha, silly! The creator created the big bang. What kind of question is this. Osara
  • The Big Bang Theory isn't really something you "believe in" -- it's something you UNDERSTAND and ACCEPT. The physics the BBT is based upon predicts three very specific things -- traces of residual microwave radiation in the depths of space from the initial burst of expansion, a hydrogen-to-helium ratio of 12:1 in the raw material of the Universe, and a "red shift" in the frequencies of light from distant galaxies as they receed from us as the Universe expands. All three of these phenomena have been observed and proven -- the Big Bang is a matter of scientific FACT.
  • I believe the big bang theory describes pretty well how our universe (as we know it) came to be. How we got to the point of the big bang, I'm not sure about. In my opinion, to say with 100% confidence that it was this god, that god or some natural process is intellectually dishonest.
  • Roller Z. has just threatened me in the name of God. He or she says to "Watch out while I'm driving." I didn't know you spoke for god. That's how he Crusades started. (Look it up Roller Z, I'm sure you have no idea what I'm talking about. Of course you must unsubscribe from comments because your debating skills suck.
  • I am now convinced that you are uneducated, and ignorant. We have discovered other planets, Jupiter, Mars, ever heard of them? That proves you wrong right there. Of course you'll just overlook this fact, and the fact that you spew such idiocy. We have discovered other planets, damn, don't you ever read? I believe in a "state, and country etc." because they are provable, your god is not. Your examples are idiocy. How can we bare god's finger prints? Are you aware of the fact that we all have different finger prints, that no two are alike? How does this point to god's exsitence? Again, idiocy. Sorry, but your argument is weak, and now is getting to the point if you making no sense what so ever. Again, you have no evidence of anything you say, none whatsoever. You believe because you want to believe. No god, no evidence, never was, never will be.
  • We have rovers on Mars now, we have been to the moon and we will go again, these are not lies but I'm not surprized you believe so, you're so scared you can hardly breath. You assume without asking, another arrogant pompus act. I went to catholic school for years, we went to church every day, I studied the bible every day, I have more knowledge of the bible in my little toe than you. Once again you have nothing to offer, you have no evidence you keep saying you do but you have shown none, zero. I'm not trying to tell you not to believe, I'm just saying I don't because of the complete lack of evidence. There is no evidence period. Just because it's written in a book or some person at church tells you something does not make it proof. Religion, all religion including yours is all just guessing because none of you have any evidence of anything. You keep saying you have proof, okay where? What? whoops, you still have nothing. No god, never was, never will be.
  • I am convinced that this fake idea of god is not for me. I have no hate for anyone either, it's just that without any evidence there's no way I'd ever believe in any religion. I am a good person, and I do good things for their own sake not because I'm being threatened by some religion.
  • In order for there to be life anywhere in the universe things have to be in perfect position with perfect amounts of this and that. An atheist believing in the "big bang" theory must believe that the universe came from nothing and by nothing. That in itself is a basis for believing in a Creator. Stephen Hawking calculated that if the rate of the universe's expansion one second after the "BANG" had been smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the universe would have collapsed into a fireball. British physicist PCW Davies has concluded that the odds against the initial conditions being suitable for the formation of stars (a necessity for planets and thus life) is a one followed by at least a thousand billion billion zeros. He also stated that if the strength of gravity were changed by only one part in a ten followed by a hundred zeros, life could never have developed. I believe in a Creator! (Taken from "The Case for Faith" by Lee Strobel)
  • neither. what makes most sense to me is called "multiverse by cycles".

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy