Why do most Mormons adhere strictly to the beginning of the Word of Wisdom (D&C 89:5-9) but pay little or no attention to the rest of it (D&C 89:12-13)?

When it was first given, the Word of Wisdom was given as advice, and not as commandment. At that time, one was entirely free to disregard it if one wished, and still remain in good standing with the church.

In the years since then, the application of the Word of Wisdom has been narrowed; and in this narrowed form, raised to level of a commandment.

Now, in order to remain worthy of a Temple Recommend, one is required to abstain from the use of the following:

• tobacco
• “strong drinks”, meaning alcoholic beverages
• “hot drinks”, meaning coffee and tea

  The only other restriction mentioned in the Word of Wisdom regards the eating of meat. See http://scriptures.lds.org/dc/89/12-13#12

12 Yea, flesh also of beasts and of
the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have
ordained for the use of man with
thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to
be used sparingly;

13 And it is pleasing unto me that
they should not be used, only in times
of winter, or of cold, or famine.

It is noticeable that today, Mormons seldom observe any noticeable restrictions on the use of meat, and our modern leaders seldom ever give any advice on the matter. I'm not aware of any authoritative explanation for this; but I've heard a number of theories.

One such theory has to do with dangers that would have existed then — but which are not applicable today — from the lack of refrigeration and of other modern methods for safely storing and preserving meat.

Another holds that in the days when the church was formed, there was a prevailing belief that meat should be the primary stable of one's diet.  More modern science shows that humans are healthiest on a balanced diet which contains much more grains and vegetables, and less meat, compared to a typical early 19th century American diet. Thus, compared to what was typical then, a diet in accordance with modern knowledge would constitute a “sparing” use of meat.

There is an article at http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/daily/health/meat.htm which gives a very good explanation of the current LDS view of meat. I think the best statement on the subject from a prominent LDS leader comes from Spencer W. Kimball, who wrote the following:

“Regarding the eating of meat, the Church
leaves that also to the discretion of
the individual. What would be required
by one person might be too much for
another. It would seem to me that a man
engaged in very heavy, physical manual
labor would require more meat than one
sitting at a desk. If one's physical
condition required an extra supply of
meat, I would not worry about the
breaking of the Word of Wisdom, in that
matter especially, if this was on
doctor's orders or if they felt that
this was the thing to do.”

This seems to me like a statement of plain common sense.  We do know that a diet that is too heavy on meat is not healthy for most people. But we also know that for some people, at least, meat is an important part of a healthy diet. This is especially true of those whose lifestyle includes a lot of hard physical work; and of people with certain medical conditions. The position of the church, as expressed here by Kimball, seems to be to leave it to each individual to determine what mount of meat is consistent with his own needs, as affected by his lifestyle and health issues.

In a much broader sense, the spirit of the Word of Wisdom is that we are to take care of our bodies. We are advised to eat a healthy diet, and to avoid taking substances into our bodies that will harm us. For the most part, this is left up to each individuals's judgement.

Comments

On the contrary, meat in any amount has been linked to heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and other serious life-threatening diseases, it's just not common knowledge because the meat industries spend millions of dollars trying to convince the public otherwise. The Word of Wisdom was obviously ahead of it's time in telling people not to partake of tobacco, alcohol and caffiene because it was not known at the time that they are harmful. Likewise, scientists are just now discovering how detrimental meat is to our health and that it should be eaten sparingly if at all. Undoubtedly a man engaged in very heavy, physical manual labor would require more CALORIES than one sitting at a desk--not meat. Calories = energy. Studies indicate that those who abstain from eating meat often have lower morbidity and mortality rates from several chronic degenerative diseases than do meat-eaters. Once again, the Word of Wisdom is ahead of it's time. I just don't understand why people don't follow it.
- Report
by kona88 on March 18th, 2007
This is not what my biology teacher told me. (Note, he has a Ph.D. in human biology.) He pointed out all of the ways in which the human digestive track is designed to handle both plant and animal products. To put it simply, God designed us to be omnivores. So, I question the bias of the studies that indicate otherwise.
- Report
by Glenn Blaylock on March 18th, 2007
Firstly, when did you take biology? I have a feeling (no offense intended) that it wasn't very recently. And the study that I cited was performed by the Food and Drug Administration. Biased? I think not, since they are the industries spending millions of dollars on campaigning beef, pork, chicken, etc.
- Report
by kona88 on March 23rd, 2007
Doesn't matter. Meet or veggies we are all going to die some day. Meat isn't an addictive substance and their are far more harmful carcenegens than meat. Like Glenn said the point is to care for our bodies. One study doesn't constitute a truth and neither do many studies. Absolute Truth is not obtained through a case study it is found through the Holy Ghost. I eat some meat, I will die some day. I don't care and neither should you.
- Report
by AbsoluteTruth on February 12th, 2010
>Absolute Truth is not obtained through a case study it is found through the Holy Ghost<

I see.

The Holy Spirit tells me that arsenic is healthy and nutritious even though the empirical evidence demonstrates that it's not.

So if I take it in faith arsenic is healthy and nutritious - right?

>Meat isn't an addictive substance and their are far more harmful carcenegens than meat<

Where does the WoW say anything about either addictive substances or carcinogens?

Plus I thought that you just told us: "Absolute Truth is not obtained through a case study it is found through the Holy Ghost" so why are you now citing from case studies to make your point?

After all the witness of the Holy Spirit is all that matters - right?
- Report
by Mister IT is trying to Liahona outta here on February 12th, 2010

Because the history of Mormonism demonstrates that "truth" is relative and not absolute.

Therefore, "truth" is whatever the current LdS Church decides what it is.

As the saying goes:
"Yesterday's doctrine is today's heresy; tomorrow's heresy is today's doctrine."

And there is no better of this than how the Word of Wisdom has been presented, applied and practiced throughout Mormon History.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
The Word of Wisdom Problem
by Joel McDonald

Like many religions, Mormonism has a dietary code which all adherents are directed to follow. This code is known as the Word of Wisdom, and the faithful believe that these dietary directions came straight from the Lord by revelation in 1833 to Joseph Smith Jr. Smith is considered by Latter-day Saints to have been the first of many prophets in these final days. For Mormons, it is vitally important that they obey the Word of Wisdom, as failure to do so can result in the loss of their salvation. There is a problem though with the application of this revelation in today’s Mormonism.

The problem is that the religion doesn’t enforce the complete dietary code, even though they claim that the words of the written revelation are the words of the Lord. Mormonism chooses only to enforce certain parts of the code, making those parts more important than the others, while the written revelation does not refer to any part as being more important, or more damning, than another.

Lastly, in reading the written revelation, one must question whether or not the Lord, or Joseph Smith, ever intended the Word of Wisdom to be enforced in a manner that would, by technicality, restrict those who live contrary to it from gaining Eternal Life.

Piecing Together The Word of Wisdom

Section 89 of the Doctrine & Covenants and Commentary

What follows is the written revelation of the Word of Wisdom from Section 89 of the Doctrine & Covenants, a book considered scripture by Mormons. Commentary is also included to point out significant details and aid the reader in understanding the passage.

“Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Kirtland, Ohio, February 27, 1833. HC 1: 327–329. As a consequence of the early brethren using tobacco in their meetings, the Prophet was led to ponder upon the matter; consequently he inquired of the Lord concerning it. This revelation, known as the Word of Wisdom, was the result. The first three verses were originally written as an inspired introduction and description by the Prophet. 1–9, Use of wine, strong drinks, tobacco, and hot drinks proscribed; 10–17, Herbs, fruits, flesh, and grain are ordained for the use of man and of animals; 18–21, Obedience to gospel law, including the Word of Wisdom, brings temporal and spiritual blessings.”

Commentary:
This is the introduction of the revelation in section 89, but not part of the revelation itself. Supposedly Emma Smith, the wife of Joseph, was angry with Joseph over the mess left by the brethren of the church after meetings, and it was Emma’s displeasure which lead him to, as Mormon’s claim, inquire and receive the revelation from the Lord (1). The introduction also breaks down sections of the passage where important items can be found.

“A Word of Wisdom, for the benefit of the council of high priests, assembled in Kirtland, and the church, and also the saints in Zion— To be sent greeting; not by commandment or constraint, but by revelation and the word of wisdom, showing forth the order and will of God in the temporal salvation of all saints in the last days— Given for a principle with promise, adapted to the capacity of the weak and the weakest of all saints, who are or can be called saints. Behold, verily, thus saith the Lord unto you:

Commentary:
Smith opens by saying that the revelation following his “inspired introduction” is given by “greeting; not by commandment or constraint”. This opens the way for argument regarding whether the Word of Wisdom should be treated as a commandment at all. Mormonism does treat The Word of Wisdom as a commandment. Mormon missionaries teach potential converts, as part of a lesson titled “Commandments” that, “The Lord revealed to the Prophet Joseph Smith a law of health called the Word of Wisdom…To be baptized and confirmed [you] must…obey the Word of Wisdom” (Preach My Gospel, 78). Baptism, according to Mormonism is essential for salvation. Failure to obey the Word of Wisdom can keep a person from being baptized, thus keeping a person from being saved. This seems to place a great deal of weight on obeying something that the Lord is written to have said was given “not by commandment”. Failure to obey the Word of Wisdom can also limit the progress that a Mormon makes within the church as failure to obey makes one unworthy to serve in various capacities in the church and unworthy to go to the temple, which is necessary to gain the highest level of salvation in Mormon doctrine.

Admittedly, he does go on to say that the Word of Wisdom is the “will of God in the temporal salvation of all saints in the last days”. To many, following the will of God is important. However, by combining what is written about the Word of Wisdom being given “not by…constraint” and also being “the will of God”, it seems that anyone who follows the principles of the Word of Wisdom will be blessed by God, but not damned because they choose not to follow the revelation. It is also mentioned that the revelation is given to aid in the “temporal salvation” of a person, not spiritual salvation. Yet in today’s Mormonism, the choice not to follow the revelation effects one’s spiritual salvation arguably more than their temporal salvation.

In fairness, Smith did say that, “No official member in this Church is worthy to hold an office after having the word of wisdom properly taught him; and he, the official member, neglecting to comply with and obey it” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 117). However, Smith’s enforcement of the resolution seems inconsistent with his actions, as will be illustrated later.

“In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days, I have warned you, and forewarn you, by giving unto you this word of wisdom by revelation—That inasmuch as any man drinketh wine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father, only in assembling yourselves together to offer up your sacraments before him. And, behold, this should be wine, yea, pure wine of the grape of the vine, of your own make. And, again, strong drinks are not for the belly, but for the washing of your bodies.”

Commentary:
In the chapter, “The Lord’s Law of Health” in Gospel Principles, it can be read that, “The Lord commands us not to use wine and strong drinks, meaning drinks containing alcohol” (3, p. 193, emphasis added). Again the church teaches that the Word of Wisdom is a commandment, when the Lord clearly opened by saying the revelation was given “not by commandment”.

The Lord reveals that the will of God is that no man (and probably woman) should drink “wine or strong drink”. At this point, the meaning of wine is clear; however, what does “strong drink” mean? The church interprets the phrase to mean any alcoholic drink. It’s possible, however, that “strong drink” could have meant liquor. This would mean that beer is permissible. Keep this in mind, as the subject of beer will be discussed again shortly.

There is an exception given here to the drinking of wine. The Lord states that wine can be used for “sacraments”. The catch is that it needs to be “pure wine, of your own make”. The interpretation is “pure wine” is that the wine used for sacraments is to not be fermented, this non-alcoholic. From this Mormons conclude that Jesus must have only drunk non-alcoholic wine. This is a misguided attempt at merging the Jesus of the Bible with the modern revelation of Joseph Smith. It is historically inaccurate that Jesus would not have drunk alcoholic wine. In fact, Jesus is accused of being a drunkard in the Biblical account of his life (4). Mormons practice baptism by immersion to follow the example of the obedient Christ. If drinking wine was acceptable to Christ, why restrict those who drink wine from following his example by being baptized?

“And again, tobacco is not for the body, neither for the belly, and is not good for man, but is an herb for bruises and all sick cattle, to be used with judgment and skill.”

Commentary:
The Lord is very clear here about tobacco not being used in or on people’s body.

“And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly.”

Commentary:
What is the meaning of “hot drinks”? Mormons interpret the ambiguous phrase to mean coffee and tea. Why hot chocolate, or even hot water, was not included in the interpretation is difficult to surmise. For Mormons, this interpretation is accepted as something setting them apart as a “peculiar people”. Not drinking coffee and tea, is critical in Mormonism as doing so will keep a person from being baptized, serving in the church, and attending the temple. In Mormonism, drinking coffee and tea, even if the phrase used in the revelation is vague and in need of interpretation, will keep a person from salvation.

At this point it is clear that Mormonism prohibits alcohol, tobacco, coffee and tea. The church focuses a great deal on these four items and usage of them will keep a person from full activity in the church and even salvation. When a person fails to abide by these prohibitions they are said to have, “a Word of Wisdom problem”.

“And again, verily I say unto you, all wholesome herbs God hath ordained for the constitution, nature, and use of man— Every herb in the season thereof, and every fruit in the season thereof; all these to be used with prudence and thanksgiving.”

Commentary:
Herbs and fruits are good for people and God wants them to eat them.

“Yea, flesh also of beasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to be used sparingly; And it is pleasing unto me that they should not be used, only in times of winter, or of cold, or famine. All grain is ordained for the use of man and of beasts, to be the staff of life, not only for man but for the beasts of the field, and the fowls of heaven, and all wild animals that run or creep on the earth; And these hath God made for the use of man only in times of famine and excess of hunger.”

Commentary:
While true that the Lord has given the earth to man to dominate (5), according to the Word of Wisdom, man shouldn’t eat meat unless it is winter, cold, or there is a famine. The Lord doesn’t want people eating meat unless there is little else to eat. This passage is extremely clear, requiring no translation whatsoever. However, unlike the vague passage above about “hot drinks”, there is no enforced prohibition on eating meat in times other than the winter, when it is warm, or when other foods are available.

This seems to be completely contradictory. Not only has today’s Mormonism taken a revelation given “not by commandment” and enforced it as such, it has chosen only to enforce certain parts, regardless of how ambiguous the wording, and ignore others. Such a practice is tantamount to choosing five of the Ten Commandments to follow and saying that you follow all of them. It is inconsistent with the Biblical portrayal of the history of God for some commandments to be less important than others. When the Lord speaks a command, the command must be followed. Failure to do so resulted in physical and spiritual death. Mormonism’s application of the Word of Wisdom is incompatible with how God has functioned in Biblical history.

Why should a person be refused baptism because they drink a cup of coffee at work each morning, but allowed the ordinance even if they have steak every night in the month of July? If it is the “will of God” that a person abstain from both practices, why is one damning while the other ignored? It seems illogical, especially considering that the the practice that damns had to be interpreted as such and the practice ignored is crystal clear in the written revelation, the words of the Lord.

“All grain is good for the food of man; as also the fruit of the vine; that which yieldeth fruit, whether in the ground or above the ground— nevertheless, wheat for man, and corn for the ox, and oats for the horse, and rye for the fowls and for swine, and for all beasts of the field, and barley for all useful animals, and for mild drinks, as also other grain.”

Commentary:
Grains, vegetables, and fruits have been provided for the nourishment of mankind and all other animals. However, a significant point in this passage is the allowance of beer.

Beer is, “an alcoholic beverage made by brewing and fermentation from cereals, usually malted barley, and flavored with hops and the like for a slightly bitter taste” (6, emphasis added). If “strong drinks” can be interpreted as meaning hard liquor, then it is possible that “mild drinks” made with barely could refer to beer. Such an interpretation is not inconsistent with the wording and context of the written revelation. However, such an interpretation would seem inconceivable to Mormons today as they’ve been taught that all alcohol is prohibited by the Lord.

“And all saints who remember to keep and do these sayings, walking in obedience to the commandments, shall receive health in their navel and marrow to their bones; And shall find wisdom and great treasures of knowledge, even hidden treasures; And shall run and not be weary, and shall walk and not faint. And I, the Lord, give unto them a promise, that the destroying angel shall pass by them, as the children of Israel, and not slay them. Amen.”

Commentary:
This is the closing of the written revelation. The Lord is written as having said that those who follow the Word of Wisdom will be healthy and will be able to gain knowledge and wisdom. Although not expressly mentioned, Mormons believe that following the revelation allows them to be able to hear the whisperings and prompting of the Holy Spirit and be guided in their lives. This is the promise mentioned in the opening passage of the revelation.
Outlining the Word of Wisdom

Below is the “will of God” concerning a person’s “temporal salvation”

Points enforced are marked in green and unenforced are marked in red.

*No wine, unless for sacraments

*No strong drinks (alcoholic drinks)

*No tobacco

*No hot drinks (coffee and tea)

*Herbs should be used

*Fruits in season should be eaten

*Meat should only be eaten in winter, cold, or famine

*Grains should be central to a person’s diet

At best, Mormonism enforces 50% of the entire revelation known as the Word of Wisdom, with the assumption the interpretation of the revelation is correct.

Joseph Smith and the Word of Wisdom
One of the best examples of Joseph Smith’s attitude toward the Word of Wisdom, and his beliefs on it being given “not by commandment” was his establishment of a bar in Smith Mansion House, in Nauvoo, Illinois. A close associate to Smith, Orrin Porter Rockwell was contracted to run the bar/barber shop. Dr. Russell Burrows of Bowling Green University explains that Smith,

“…set up Rockwell in a combination barbershop and a bar—a venture to work in concert with Smith’s Mansion House, which was church headquarters, as well as Smith’s private residence. This hub of the rapidly expanding Nauvoo could well have used the nearby amenities of a barbershop and a bar—and besides, a job there would have given Rockwell an almost perfect chance to watch who had been coming and going from the holy city. Beneath the surface of this unlikely arrangement, it’s almost as though Smith were chuckling at the prospect of a latter-day Samson (one of Smith’s own creation), cutting hair—especially, if ever it were Gentiles’ hair. And Rockwell, for his part, was agreeable, if probably doubtful about the barbering.

The bar tending he would rise to, ably assisted by his church elders, for Smith magnanimously ordered in a polished bar along with a stock of liquors with which to school Rockwell in the more heady spirits and their mixes. And Smith set up this tutelage in a wing of the Mansion House, while—as was convenient—his first and official wife, Emma, was away down river to St. Louis on a trip to buy furniture. Historically, Joseph Smith threw this party some ten years after he had brought out The Word of Wisdom, in which the Persona of the Almighty enjoins: “strong drinks are not for the belly, but for the washing of your bodies.” But a washed and a combed Rockwell was there behind his bar, setting up his brethren with a warm and a high time of it, when Emma Smith pulled back into town. She got her first look at what was going on and vanquished the prophet—pretty much “horse and foot,” in that splendid old war phrase—by throwing his woozy fraternity from the home where she had been raising children. (8)”

Certainly Joseph Smith, as a prophet of God, would not have established a bar in his own home, or even allowed liquor, if he believed that the consumption of alcohol was damning to the immoral soul.
Conclusion

It has been clearly established that the original intention of the Word of Wisdom was that it not be compulsory. It has also been established that the Mormon church today enforces only a part of the total revelation while effectively ignoring the total. This is an incompatible and inappropriate use of revelation. While it is understandable that Mormonism desires to decrease the negative effects of addiction, the Word of Wisdom shouldn’t be butchered and used piecemeal to limit these effects. If the Mormon church desires to prohibit its members from alcohol, coffee, tea, and tobacco, it should do so without invoking the revelation. Appropriately used, the Word of Wisdom is guidance on healthy living. While it may be wise to follow what is written as “the will of God”, failure to do so should not be eternally damning.
http://wonderwitch.blogspot.com/2007/08/word-of-wisdom-problem.html

Question

Why do most Mormons adhere strictly to the beginning of the Word of Wisdom (D&C 89:5-9) but pay little or no attention to the rest of it (D&C 89:12-13)?

Answers. 4 helpful answers below.

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Why do Mormons emphasize part of the Word of Wisdom and ignore the part forbidding the eating of meat except in winter, cold or famine? (Doc. & Cov. 89:12,13).

When God revealed the "Word of Wisdom" (D&C 89) as a health guide for the Saints why did He recommend tobacco as a poultice for bruises in verse 8? Is some some scientific or medical evidence that validates this? Do some Mormons follow this practice?

If God is a spirit (John 4:24) and a spirit is a being without a body (D&C 129:2), why do Mormons teach that God the Father (D&C 130:22) and Angels (D&C 129:1) have bodies of flesh and bones?

MORMONS: Why does D&C128:5;17-18 contradict the rest of LdS Scripture regarding baptism as a requirement for salvation?

Why did 'the Lord' give the Word of Wisdom as found in D&C 89 as a commandment to Joseph Smith but later it was decided that it wasn't actually a commandment just advice? It is now a commandment again.

Professionally Researched

Does a D.C.-based branch of a Nevada bank have to obey D.C. law?

Can you install Windows Vista on a Compaq EVO N1000c p4-1.7 40 Gig laptop c4k d-041?

Can you get a work permit in D.C.?

Is pepper spray legal in Washington D.C.?

When was the Philippine Embassy in D.C. built?

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Answerbag.com
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!

Question

Why do most Mormons adhere strictly to the beginning of the Word of Wisdom (D&C 89:5-9) but pay little or no attention to the rest of it (D&C 89:12-13)?

Answers. 4 helpful answers below.

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Professionally Researched

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Answerbag.com Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!

Answerbag.com
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!