Faith is faith;' fact is fact. They are separate disciplines.

Just read "The Origin of Species." The book is chock-full of evidence, should one want to find any.

There is no proof, only evidence, massive massive thousands of textbooks and scientific research worth of evidence.

doubting evolution is like doubting that the world is a sphere

http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-origin-of-species/

well i would go into to how chimps have 24 gametes & we have 23 & the only way we could have evolved from them is if one of their fused with another, & our 2nd chromosome is fused with another... but that would be right & christians would get mad.

there is a hell of a lot of proof for it. I would be here all day. check out these websites instead hope they help you. http://records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/essays/courtenay1.htm http://blog.lib.umn.edu/denis036/thisweekinevolution/2009/04/evolutionproof.html If you want to also know proof that evolution is not correct then check out this: http://www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm

Prove god exists. And no the bible isn't proof.

as a creationist stupid arguments like this piss me off. you make us all look stupid.

The recent mutations of flu viruses should be tangible enough proof for any human. The proof of evolution is all around you; it is you who refuses to accept it. Mutation of life forms is evolution in action.

Is this really a question or is it a baiting question to challenge who is right and who is wrong?

Whale Knuckles. What need does a whale have for knuckles? I know how you're going to answer- that who can dare question God in his infinite majesty? I do. What need does a whale need for knuckles? Or the thumb of the panda? Or the bill of a Platypus? What would you accept as proof? http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

DAMN IT! WHY DOES AB SUCK SO BADLY!!!

When you break it down, proving anything can be daunting. Can you prove there was a God that made the world?

GOD's Signs in the DNA Since DNA contains information, the case can be stated even more strongly in terms of information theory, a field of research that investigates the ways information is transmitted. The naturalistic scientist has only two possible ways to explain the origin of life-either chance or natural law. But information theory provides a powerful tool for discounting both of these explanations. Both chance and law lead to structures with low information content, whereas DNA has a very high information content." The sequence of basis in DNA can not be explained by natural law because there are no chemical laws that make any sequence more likely than another. At the same time these sequences are so complicated that they can not be explained by chance. "Based on probability factors . . any viable DNA strand having over 84 nucleotides cannot be the result of haphazard mutations. At that stage, the probabilities are 1 in 4.80 x 10[[50]]. Such a number, if written out, would read: 480,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000. "Mathematicians agree that any requisite number beyond 10[50] has, statistically, a zero probability of occurrence (and even that gives it the benefit of the doubt!). Any species known to us, including the smallest single-cell bacteria, have enormously larger number of nucleotides than 100 or 1000. In fact, single cell bacteria display about 3,000,000 nucleotides, aligned in a very specific sequence. This means that there is no mathematical probability whatever for any known species to have been the product of a random occurrence—random mutations (to use the evolutionist's favorite expression)."—I. L. Cohen, Darwin was Wrong, 1984, p. 205. The study of DNA provides powerful new evidence that life is the product of intelligent design. Today, holding on to the hope that some natural process will be found to explain DNA is supremely irrational. The elusive process that naturalists hope to find would have to be completely unprecedented, different in kind from any we currently know. Although humans share about 97% of their DNA structure with some higher non-human animals, those last 3% are so vital that all of human civilization, religion, art, science, philosophy and, most importantly, their moral nature depends upon it. It is the 3% that distinguishes the theistic view of man's origin from the non-theistic view, as well as from the various societal and cultural consequences distinguishing each belief. As John Quincy Adams warned long ago, without a belief in theistic origins [in that three percent difference] man will have no conscience. He will have no other law than that of the tiger and the shark."

I’ve found God, Says Man who Cracked the Human Genome The Sunday Times June 11, 2006 By: Steven Swinford Source: Times Online http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article673663.ece THE scientist who led the team that cracked the human genome is to publish a book explaining why he now believes in the existence of God and is convinced that miracles are real. Francis Collins, the director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute, claims there is a rational basis for a creator and that scientific discoveries bring man “closer to God”. For Collins, unravelling the human genome did not create a conflict in his mind. Instead, it allowed him to “glimpse at the workings of God”. “When you make a breakthrough it is a moment of scientific exhilaration because you have been on this search and seem to have found it,” he said. “But it is also a moment where I at least feel closeness to the creator in the sense of having now perceived something that no human knew before but God knew all along. “When you have for the first time in front of you this 3.1 billion-letter instruction book that conveys all kinds of information and all kinds of mystery about humankind, you can’t survey that going through page after page without a sense of awe. I can’t help but look at those pages and have a vague sense that this is giving me a glimpse of God’s mind.” Collins joins a line of scientists whose research deepened their belief in God. Isaac Newton, whose discovery of the laws of gravity reshaped our understanding of the universe, said: “This most beautiful system could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful being."

The Fameous Atheist Philosopher 'Anthony Flew' Announced that Indeed the Universe was Created! 'I Do Believe in God after all' One of the most renowned atheists of the past half century has changed his mind and decided that there is a God after all. “As people have certainly been influenced by me, I want to try and correct the enormous damage I may have done.” (Anthony Flew) The newspapers were echoing with these regret-filled words by Antony Flew, in his time a well-known atheist philosopher. The 81-year-old British professor of philosophy Flew chose to become an atheist at the age of 15, and first made a name for himself in the academic field with a paper published in 1950. In the 54 years that followed, he defended atheism as a teacher at the universities of Oxford, Aberdeen, Keele and Reading, at many American and Canadian universities he visited, in debates, books, lecture halls and articles. In recent days, however, Flew has announced that he has abandoned this error and accepts that the universe was created. The decisive factor in this radical change of view is the clear and definitive evidence revealed by science on the subject of creation. Flew realized, in the face of the information-based complexity of life, that the true origin of life is intelligent design and that the atheism he had espoused for 66 years was a discredited philosophy. Flew announced the scientific reasons underlying this change in belief in these terms: “Biologists’ investigation of DNA has shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce [life], that intelligence must have been involved.” [1] “It has become inordinately difficult even to begin to think about constructing a naturalistic theory of the evolution of that first reproducing organism.” [2] “I have been persuaded that it is simply out of the question that the first living matter evolved out of dead matter and then developed into an extraordinarily complicated creature.” [3] The DNA research which Flew cites as a fundamental reason for his change of opinion has indeed revealed striking facts about creation. The helix shape of the DNA molecule, its possession of the genetic code, the nucleotide strings that refute blind chance, the storage of encyclopedic quantities of information and many other striking findings have revealed that the structure and functions of this molecule were arranged for life with a special design. Comments by scientists concerned with DNA research bear witness to this fact. Francis Crick, for instance, one of the scientists who revealed the helix shape of DNA admitted in the face of the findings regarding DNA that the origin of life indicated a miracle: An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going.[4] Based on his calculations, Led Adleman of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles has stated that one gram of DNA can store as much information as a trillion compact discs.[5] Gene Myers, a scientist employed on the Human Genome Project, has said the following in the face of the miraculous arrangements he witnessed: “What really astounds me is the architecture of life… The system is extremely complex. It’s like it was designed… There’s a huge intelligence there.”[6] The most striking fact about DNA is that the existence of the coded genetic information can definitely not be explained in terms of matter and energy or natural laws. Dr. Werner Gitt, a professor at the German Federal Institute of Physics and Technology, has said this on the subject: A code system is always the result of a mental process… It should be emphasized that matter as such is unable to generate any code. All experiences indicate that a thinking being voluntarily exercising his own free will, cognition, and creativity, is required… There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this.[7] Creationist scientists and philosophers played a major role in Flew’s acceptance of intelligent design, backed up by all these findings. In recent times Flew participated in debates with scientists and philosophers who were proponents of creation, and exchanged ideas with them. The final turning point in that process was a discussion organized by the Institute for Metascientific Research in Texas in May, 2003. Professor Flew participated in the discussion together with the author, Roy Abraham Varghese, a physicist, and the molecular biologist, Gerald Schroeder. Flew was impressed by the weight of the scientific evidence in favor of creation and by the convincing nature of his opponents’ arguments and abandoned atheism as an idea in the period following that discussion. In a letter he wrote for the August-September, 2003, edition of the British magazine Philosophy Now, he recommended Schroeder’s book “The Hidden Face of God: Science Reveals the Ultimate Truth” and Varghese’s book “The Wonderful World.”[8] During an interview with the professor of philosophy and theology Gary R. Habermas, who also played a major role in his change of mind,[9] and also on the video “Has Science Discovered God?” he openly stated that he believed in intelligent design. The “Intelligence Pervading the Universe” and the Collapse of Atheism In the face of all the scientific developments outlined above, the acceptance of intelligent design by Anthony Flew, famous for defending atheism for many years, reflects a final scene in the process of collapse which atheism is being subjected to Modern science has revealed the existence of an “intelligence pervading the universe,” thus leaving atheism out of the equation. In his book “The Hidden Face of God," Gerald Schroeder, one of the creationist scientists who influenced Flew, writes: A single consciousness, a universal wisdom, pervades the universe. The discoveries of science, those that search the quantum nature of subatomic matter, have moved us to the brink of a startling realization: all existence is the expression of this wisdom. In the laboratories we experience it as information that first physically articulated as energy and then condensed into the form of matter. Every particle, every being, from atom to human, appears to represent a level of information, of wisdom. [10] Scientific research into both the functioning of the cell and the subatomic particles of matter has revealed this fact in an indisputable manner: Life and the universe were brought into being from nothing by the will of an entity possessed of a superior mind and wisdom. There is no doubt that the possessor of that knowledge and mind that designed the universe at all levels is Almighty Allah (God). Allah (God) reveals these truths in many verses of the Quran. References: [1] Richard N. Ostling, “Lifelong atheist changes mind about divine creator,” The Washington Times 10 December 2004; (Washington Times - Lifelong atheist changes mind about divine creator.) http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041209-113212-2782r.htm [2] Antony Flew, “Letter from Antony Flew on Darwinism and Theology,” Philosophy Now; (Philosophy Now.) http://www.philosophynow.org/issue47/47flew.htm [3] Stuart Wavell and Will Iredale, “Sorry, says atheist-in-chief, I do believe in God after all,” The Sunday Times, 12 December 2004; (Sorry, says atheist-in-chief, I do believe in God after all - Times Online) http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1400368,00.html [4] Francis Crick, Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1981, p. 88 [5] John Whitfield, “Physicists plunder life’s tool chest”, 24 April 2003; (No article with this DOI : Nature News) http://www.nature.com/nsu/030421/030421-6.html [6] San Francisco Chronicle, 19 February, 2001 [7] Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, CLV, Bielenfeld, Germany, pp. 64-7, 79 [8] Antony Flew, “Letter from Antony Flew on Darwinism and Theology,” Philosophy Now; (Philosophy Now.) http://www.philosophynow.org/issue47/47flew.htm [9] “Atheist Becomes Theist: Exclusive Interview with Former Atheist Antony Flew;” (Biola > Page 1 : Biola News & Communications.) http://www.biola.edu/antonyflew/index.cfm [10] Gerald Schroeder, The Hidden Face of God, Touchstone, New York, 2001, p. xi.

your typing this q in a computer not painting it on a cave wall

Sadly, I can't tell you to look in the mirror cause you obviously ain't it

Fossils do indeed show only the record of evolution, not evolution in action. Like tyre tracks show that a car passed this way, but they do not show the car. But it is perverse to deny what the record shows happened. We can reasonably deduce from the tracks that a car passed - or that some malicious person carefully created tracks that look like a car. Similarly we can deduce that evolution happened, or that a malicious Creator deliberately created fossils that make it look as if evolution happened. As to your choices: 1 - nothing you can do about it. 2 - not tenable: the universe shows many signs of change; if it has always been here, it has been changing. 3 & 4: let's look for the evidence. In the case of 3, Christians have one book to offer; Muslims a different book, Hindus two or three more. Whereas there is a wealthy of physical evidence for 4.

There is none. Many feel that there is evidence for evolution. Others feel that there is evidence for creation. It comes down to which evidence one believes and what one chooses to have faith in. Both require a measure of faith because none of us were there.

Ok, I'll take the bait. - If you look through the fossil record, through layers of rock, you will find simpler organisms came before more complex organisms.

If we all came from Adam & Eve, can you please explain how we have so many different races of today within 6,000 years? Also, if Noah only brought two of every animal, can you please explain how we have over 150 different types of dogs in the world ranging from Chihuahua to Poodles to Retrievers? If both these stories are true, then the Bible is a big supporter of evolution.

just wait man youll have more proof than you can stand in time