The Chinese 'occupation of tibet' - inhuman persecution of a noble race or emancipation for countless peasants under an inhuman theocracy - Can you supress a knee-jerk reaction?
by 
originallyjustme
ANSWERS: 4
-
What's your question?
-
If it was just an emancipation of the peasants (LOL), there would hardly be a need to move millions of Chinese peasants into Tibet, where the Chinese population is actually greater now than the native Tibetan population. If the people of Tibet thought it was an emancipation, it seems unlikely that the Chinese government would have found the need to cause the death of up to a million people since the invasion in 1950. On which side would the knee-jerk reaction be?
-
There is no way that institutionalized slavers like the Chinese communists can emancipate anybody. They have made slaves of a defenseless people because of their hedgemonic designs, and the fact that Tibet is low hanging fruit and a target of opportunity. I do not care how many people there are in China, how big a market place it is, or how many of our bonds they buy, the Chinese communists engage in the enslavement of billions of human beings. How can anybody over look that?
-
Tibet is not a part of China - they have no business being in Tibet.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC