- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
How do I legally change a name after marriage?
by Answerbag Staff on June 2nd, 2010
| 3 people like this
How long after marriage can a female change her name?
by Answerbag Staff on June 2nd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Wow..really!? What happened after that!?
by June 14 hours ago
| 3 people like this
What does it cost to change your name?
by Answerbag Staff on May 21st, 2010
| 2 people like this
i have a friend that has helped me out a lot when i lost my job, she literally found me a place to stay,
by lederman 15 hours ago
| 1 person likes this
You're reading It SEEMS that recycling and conservation is primarily an interest of the Liberal left? Doesn't the right wing enjoy and take pride in a clean country too? Don't they feel an obligation to treasure the gift God has given? Why not a more public stand?
Comments
What good will money be when there is no air to breathe, no water to drink, no land to live on?
by DavidHume on February 13th, 2007
David, conservatives are not in favor of polluting the air we breath or the water we drink. This is a straw man argument that is always used by the left to demonize us and it really gets tiresome. As for land to live on, we are not running out of that. There is still lots of land on which we can live.
by Glenn Blaylock on February 13th, 2007
Aren't you the same Glenn Blaylock who was arguing there was no such thing as global warming a week ago?
by DavidHume on February 13th, 2007
It doesn't look like conservatives are trying to seek a BALANCE when they only just started admitting to global warming. Why is it only up to Al Gore? Why aren't any of them driving hybrids across the country? At least Al Gore had the balls to tell the truth.
by beenaroundtheblock on February 13th, 2007
"Straw man" is one of these gambits in a medium like this that really makes me groan. Originally, conservatives were a respectable breed who argued against radical change and preserved social momentum. Modern day conservatives ("neo-cons") only seem concerned with money, a belief utterly incompatible with environmentalism.
by DavidHume on February 13th, 2007
It seems, then, DavidHume, that the conservative side is the one that is acting as it should; and as it historically would be expected to act. It is the environmentalists that are making outrageous claims of impending ecological catastrophe, and proposing radical measures to avert it; all in the almost total absence of solid scientific evidence to support either the impending catastrophe or the safety and effectiveness of the proposed remedies. Yes, I am arguing against radical change (at least until there is some credible science to support the need for it) and for preserving social and economic momentum. You're the one that is arguing for radical change, and without any regard for the social or economic consequences of this change.
by Anonymous on February 13th, 2007