- NEW!
by Nick on January 6th, 2009
In many cases, it can. Marcel Duchamp gave one definition of art and said it is based on 50% contribution by the beholder.
Yet I think that without a convincing form, art cannot exist.
by science_geek on January 5th, 2009
I would say that in this case it was the appreciation of the art that was impacted by the context. I'm sure that the art he produced was fantastic, but it fell on the ears of people who were unable to appreciate what it was.
Another point to consider here is illustrated by the story of the Emperors New Clothes.
http://deoxy.org/emperors.htm
Do you prefer traditional art ,modern art or other?
by Bornabrit on September 25th, 2011
| 5 people like this
Is nudity synonymous with sexuality? Does art help separate these two realities?
by GibsonGuy on August 20th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Is it against the law for being commissioned drawn artwork, like fan art, someone's character, or even scenery on paper or digital paper?
by IshiGray on October 4th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What do you think of art exhibits that use actual human bodies to convey something?
by Michelle on October 13th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What are your two favorite colors? Mine are pink and purple.
by greyowl on September 1st, 2011
| 7 people like this
You're reading Your opinion On : Does context make Art?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments