by sweaver9 on January 10th, 2007

sweaver9

Question

Help answer this question below.

Should there be a cap on what a player drafted out of college can make his first year in the NFL. How can a player hold out his rookie year for a mult-million dollar contract without proving himself first? Should he have to play for who drafted him?

Answers. 1 helpful answer below.

  • by LordKiro on April 15th, 2009

    LordKiro

    There should be a cap. But if there was a cap it would give players a reason to under perform (which would make college football boring). This wouldn't apply to all players only NCAA Div's 1-3. Community college players don't really get as much attention as NCAA school players do. For the second part that falls on the team because of the rules of drafting and contracts to said players. I personally think by a team saying with our #1 Draft pick we choose the best QB in the nation is a Gambit. They dangle a great player in front of fans, who (depending on what team it is) now because of this savior believe they have a chance to win something and rush out to buy season tickets and what-not (sorry Detroit Fans) only to have the player hold out for a huge contract. NFL execs know exactly what they are doing. Yes he should have to play for who drafted him and I mean really play.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Should there be a cap on what a player drafted out of college can make his first year in the NFL. How can a player hold out his rookie year for a mult-million dollar contract without proving himself first? Should he have to play for who drafted him?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads