Well a scientific argument can be since man "evolved" into what we are now, we haven't changed at all. If we evolved we would continue to change

Timing on the fossil evidence is not 100% accurate...strata dating is now proving to be very unreliable.

We have changed in the sense we are no longer hunting with spears and living in caves. Why would we need to evolve when we are able to adapt and change our surroundings and our ways of living without the help of nature.

ALL arguments against evolution are quickly rubbished by anyone who knows what science is.

I tried to look some up for you on the internet, but all I can find are creationist sites. (T.T)

Evolution relies on random gene mutations occurring over a long period of time. Small gradual changes make up life as we know it. OK problem. 1. Mutations are rare. 2. Mutations are harmful. 3. Probability of the correct gene mutation occurring to produce a beneficial gene change. 4. Does not work on organisms with long or slow reproduction rates. For example Evolutionist will point to changes observed in bacteria. Problem, is bacteria reproduce quickly. Try that with an elephant. The probability works against random genes changes resulting from mutations. Basically the law of averages defeats evolution................................................................................ Here is the correction. I have not and will not delete my original answer so anyone can follow along and see why people disagreed with me. And in part they were correct. Here it is it's almost the same. Correction as of July 07, 09 Evolution relies on random gene mutations occurring over a long period of time. Small gradual changes make up life as we know it. OK problems. 1. Beneficial Mutations are rare. 2. Measurable Mutations are generally harmful. 3. Probability of the correct gene mutation occurring to produce a beneficial gene change. 4. Does not work on organisms with long or slow reproduction rates. For example Evolutionist will point to changes observed in bacteria. Problem, is bacteria reproduce quickly. Try that with an elephant. The probability works against random genes changes resulting from mutations. Basically the law of averages defeats evolution.

Good arguments, none that I know of. There are some arguments such as creationism or unintelligent design. Those are more fantasy though.

i never heard a good argument against evolution...merely the rantings of irrational "believers" in some fictitious god

Oh, man, you guys are killing me tonight! Don't stop! I'm now getting paid five bucks for every submission I make to Fundies Say The Darnest Things

If I had to argue against evolution I would argue that it is a test for nonbelievers. The brilliance of the “evolution as a test” argument is that any “evidence” found for evolution simply becomes part of the test.

The best argument against learning about evolution is when someone says: I'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED BY A RELIGIOUS CULT AND I'M TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, LA LA LA LA.

* if we evolved to human form. why are we not continuing to evolve?? *how did the universe form...from nothing?? it can't form from a primitive cell. which also means that a thinking human couldn't just come from nowhere!!! http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/evoluwrong.html i haven't checked out this video but check it out yourself http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=817b7893bcdeed13799b

Evolution has been a theory for over 150 years now, science will and has always questioned it(any and all theories for that matter) and will continue to do so but there is no other theory that comes close, thats not to say there wont be one in the future, science finds answer so if evoultion is wrong science will find out thou at this time its very hard to see evolution as wrong the evidence is overwhelming. so good argumnets aginst evolution, there really isnt any at this time. just like theres no good argument against the theory of Relativity and so on.. Theories in science dont become a theory with alot of evidence so you see a good argument against any theory are quite hard to find but again it can be done.

LOL haven't you heard AB's own "Moosemose" has debunked the theory of evolution with his observation of snakes!?

Nothing was always there. "something" created earth and the stars we see as well as the whole solar system. Evolution took over from there.

I've never heard any.

goddidit

Just tell me how something can evolve from nothing