- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
You can't buy love but with money you can rent it for a little while.
Love is far better!! Family keeps you warm and happy inside and out. Money leaves you hollow inside after you spend it. Money is easier to waste and loose. Money promotes selfishness and greed Love does not.
Love is so hard to find...and when it does make it's appearence, the odds of it breaking you into melancholy are too great. Better to have loved and loss than to never have loved at all?--no. They say money corrupts -- but I say we are already corrupted and money's just a remedy to our ignorant state of mind.
When it comes down to it money
Definitely love. Walking around in a million dollar mansion alone or with people you feel mediocre about is only fun for a while, and then it wears off really quick. You could have all the money in the world and if you don't have someone you love to share it with, then what's the point?
As the Beatles said, "Can't buy me love."
Love is better, whether you have money or are poor.
Love (but only if he/she is super rich)
You can love money, but you can't buy love, so love is better.
Love, besides money can't buy happiness. Money is immaterial.
Love...outrightly.
Reasons...many
1. You can't earn it...unlike money
2. You could have shit-loads of it but still want/yearn for more, not sure if Bill Gates complains everyday of wanting to earn a few hundred K more.
3. No matter how much $$$ you may have, you really cannot carry it with you six-feet under or on your funeral pyre. Love, on the other hands, stays all the time...in the remembrances your loved ones have of you.
4. Cannot be stolen.
5. Does not determine social stature.
6. Much more powerful possession than money.
Love is better in general, but I don't cope well with love, I get a guilt complex and turn all angsty, so I personaly would take money, I do cope well with money.
love because what would be the point in having money if you were unhappy and had noone to share it with. also money isnt the answer to everything.
i'd have to think love
Money. Love hurts you, money doesn't
love. then when i have that a lot of money...lol
Money.
Money can buy happyness - but happyness can't buy groceries.
Love I give and receive always - - can I have a little money also???????????
Love diffidently!!
Love, by a country mile. I know lots of lonely rich people and lots of not-so-rich people in love. From my viewpoint, those who have love are happier. Great question..+3
Always for love!!!
I must have chosen love, because we sure don't have any money.
Love - no-brainer for me.
Love... I can make the money!!!
Love. Money has no inherent joy or value.
Even though we aint got money,i'm so in LOVE with you honey !
The sad truth is if you have no money you won't find love
what about a lover with money?
well "Love is the answer and you know that, for sure"
Love is better.
True money.
I don't believe people "choose" to love. Love is what
love is. But to answer your question, I haven't
experienced anything greater than love.
I would choose love over money in a second!!! Money means nothing if you don't have anyone to spend it on!!!1
i dont believe love is a choice. it just is.
Normally I'd say love but right now I need the money more.
Money we are told makes the world go round but love puts your heart in a spin.
love definately. but, no money can put a lot of stress on a relasionship. i would much rather be in love than in money.
I like money, but love is always better!
love is better because money you can get it anytime but love you can only have a few times. love has to involve with the person you have feelings for and that person may have alot of money and you find yourself in love
Love .. I have had both and money dont make you half as happy as real love does.
It has to be real love though !
I hope to have love in my life, because it's always been part of my lifelong dream. However I'd also want enough money to live comfortably. I'm not looking for crap overkill. I mean, I don't need (or even want) a 1K$ watch or a 100K$ car! Simple pleasures are best, and that's all any of us should aim to have really. Besides, those expensive things only end up complicating what is otherwise very easy!
To have true love in our life is probably the most basic want for all of us. And since more than half of all marriages fail, it's a safe guess that money has something to do with the failture of couples to work out their finances, without restraint, jointly shared and managed in trust. For us to be truly wealthy, we must stop loving things and start loving people.
Does cash help negotiate us a better life? Would you risk losing love and life to have money? At what expense? What would be worth it all in the end? How would you change the world, or would you take it with you?
To read an excellent essay on CalicoCat.com titled "Is Money The Root Of All Evil," click here: http://www.calicocat.com/2004/05/is-money-root-of-all-evil.html
I would have to say love, you cannot put a price tag on that. But it would help if he was rich too, but we cannot have it all. :)
Love, if u look at the world u see that love can make u happy in a way that money cannot. Some of the poorest people in the world are the happiest in the world because they have family/friends who love them. There are a bunch of rich old guys in the world who missed out on love because they were too busy trying to get more and more money, so they are alone and unhappy. who would u rather be a poor guy with hope love and a good family. or the rich old guy waiting to die alone with noone to share his last moments with?
Love....theres no alternative!
Most definitely True Love....:)
True love, without even a moment’s hesitation. I’d rather be dirt poor with a woman I was mutually madly in love with, than rich with someone who didn’t care how I felt. I was in a relationship with a girl who had Narcissistic Personality Disorder. She had no concept of other people’s feelings. It’s a horrible feeling to feel hurt by someone you love, then have them attack you when you try to explain that your feelings were hurt.
Of course having true love AND money is the optimal situation. ;)
I would go with love, money is just a piece of paper
Well.... Now that I think of it, I think love would be one of the most meaningful objects in life. Sure you can have practicly everything you want with money. I would rather grow old with someone I love.
Love, I am alaready moneyless.....So I know I can live without it. +5
love. money cannot buy love.
I will go with a good mixture of both.
At this point in my life, money.
ARE YOU negligent?
by shunyata on October 30th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What philosophy do you try to apply to your day to day life?
by Desiderata on November 16th, 2010
| 7 people like this
Who is a better leader a man of "wisdom" or a man of "Intellect"?
by andy11-11 on December 4th, 2010
| 2 people like this
Which is the better existential novel, Camus' The Outsider, or Sartre's Nausea?
by nest on November 26th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Letting go of desires ? Many are into eating junk food,obsess with sex,endless sensual pleasures. Yet those are known to cause suffering.
by shunyata on October 30th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Love or money which is better?
- which can also be phrased in the following ways:
Comments
Not real love, but something that resembles it.
by Brickson on December 16th, 2006
hee hee
by gerrik on December 16th, 2006
LOL good answer..
by JUSTNORMAL on December 16th, 2006
Ha... great answer.
by francesca says on February 4th, 2007
Love this answer. It reminds me of RENT. Have you seen it?
by CSWarn on April 7th, 2007