- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
If the rule is survival of the fittest how come everyone seems so unfit?
by Ombliss22 on February 1st, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Out of all of the great evolutionary adaptations that animals have gone through, why didn't any of them evolve to taste bad?
by Nightkeeper on February 2nd, 2012
| 2 people like this
Since language, tools and smarts worked so well for humans why has nothing else benefited from these advantages and bred on?
by -O-uknow on March 25th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
What "evolutionary" changes do you see the human race undergoing in the next 1000 years?
by bladecloudstar777 on March 12th, 2012
| 5 people like this
If evolution is true, then why do women dressed up as cats look so hot, huh? What evolutionary advantage could there be to boinking cats?
by Amorphous Blob on February 9th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Why do people call "evolution" that which has been intelligently designed? You've heard of the "evolution" of the computer or automobile. There's a new video game called "Spores: Evolution" in which everything is intelligently designed. Why the confusion?
Comments
You're using the rather wrong Creationist/ID interpretation of the 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics, which states, in its correct form, "in a closed system, entropy increases". Creationist/ID people incorrectly assume it applies to any system.
.
The Universe is a closed system, but there is no reason why all portions of it need to increase in entropy at exactly the same rate.
.
In fact, entropy is defined and calculated as "heat transfer". Heat must increase in order for entropy to increase, but this means that the area the heat transfers from must necessarily experience a decrease in entropy, a decrease in heat.
.
Case in point: the boiling of water. According to the Creationist/ID version of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, it is *impossible* to boil water, because the area immediately beneath the flame has to decrease in entropy in order to transfer the heat into the boiling water. A *decrease* in entropy occurs in the *open* system, violating a core Creationist/ID belief.
by eternal0void on June 10th, 2009
According to the accurate 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, entropy can decrease in an open system, or decrease in a portion of a closed system as long as entropy increases twice as fast in some other area of the closed system.
.
Thus it can be demonstrated that pseudoscience is how Creationism/ID comes up with at least one of its claims about the Universe.
.
Secondly, the origin of life is not essential to understanding the process by which it changes from one species into another. You're arguing against abiogenesis, and then trying to claim it is an argument against macroevolution, which is faulty reasoning.
by eternal0void on June 10th, 2009