Ask a new question or post a poll.
Answers. Every Question Deserves a Great Answer

News: Answers with images and videos

by Halliburton Shill on December 20th, 2007

Halliburton Shill

Question

Help answer this question below.

Does President Bush-Cheney need the phone companies to lose evidence for them too?

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by Will on December 28th, 2007

    Will

    The need to take lessons from the Clinton's to get it done correctly.

    Comments
    • And you know this how?

      Halliburton Shill

      by Halliburton Shill on December 29th, 2007

    • Well it's a helluva lot more common knowledge the Clintons are experts in hiding and destroying facts than anyone else on the planet if you don't have your ignorant liberal head so buried in the sand.

      Capt. Jack  Sparrow  GALCIY

      by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on December 29th, 2007

    • "Common knowledge" is nothing more than another way of saying "some say". Rumor and innuendo. Prove it or squat on it.

      Halliburton Shill

      by Halliburton Shill on December 29th, 2007

    • I could just as easily say the same to you about every one of your unfounded allegations.

      Capt. Jack  Sparrow  GALCIY

      by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on December 30th, 2007

    • The Clintons only lose information temporarily. Then after the statute of limitations runs out, the Rose Law Firm billing records mysteriously show up on a coffee table in the East Wing. LOL!
      Sandy Berger must have smuggled in those rheams of paper in his socks! LMAO!!

      aaa

      by aaa on December 30th, 2007

    • High-five Arlo
      ;-{D~

      Capt. Jack  Sparrow  GALCIY

      by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on December 30th, 2007

    • Back atcha.
      The most recent example is the Clintons refusing to release the documents from The Billy Jeff Presidential Library related to Her Royal Thighness' Health Care Taskforce back in the early '90s.
      She claims she has more experience than Obama, but we can't see any evidence of it. Hmmmm. The only government experience she has is handling bimbo eruptions and winging ashtrays and lamps at Billy Jeff in the White House. LMAO!!!!!

      aaa

      by aaa on December 30th, 2007

    • If Clinton had divorced Hillary and married Monica, Monica would be the Dem Presidential Candidate front runner now. If it wasn't so sad, it would be hilarious.

      aaa

      by aaa on December 30th, 2007

    • Lessons for the republitard echo chamber:
      http://shilllicker.blogspot.com/2007/12/squat-on-it.html

      Halliburton Shill

      by Halliburton Shill on December 30th, 2007

    • Maybe this goes back too far for you HS, but check up on the Gulf of Tonkin resolution and get back to me. Some of us still remember that one. Maybe we should have sought some UN resolutions, ya think?

      aaa

      by aaa on December 30th, 2007

    • I think YOU'RE the one that said "prove it or squat on it." Need any more proof?

      aaa

      by aaa on December 30th, 2007

    • I still wish all would take my recommendation to read the book DERELICTION OF DUTY by the seemingly very moderate Lt. Col. "Buzz" Paterson(ret.) it's very enlightening into how Hillary and Bill too for that matter were behind the scenes.
      It doesn't even use real big words so even devout Democrats ought to be able to read it.(Sorry no pictures though)

      Capt. Jack  Sparrow  GALCIY

      by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on December 30th, 2007

    • Buzz was one of the guys that carried the football, wasn't he? I bet he has some stories he can't tell.

      aaa

      by aaa on December 30th, 2007

    • Yep Buzz was one of the carriers, and decidedly fairly moderate, the book is a fairly quick read but quite enlightening.
      Of course some love to live in complete denial.

      Capt. Jack  Sparrow  GALCIY

      by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on December 30th, 2007

    • Yes, spam some tin-hat Republican books, but don't actually provide evidence or deal with the question of why Bush-Cheney are seeking to give phone companies immunity for spying.

      Halliburton Shill

      by Halliburton Shill on January 3rd, 2008

    • I was hoping you were going to recant your position:
      ("Common knowledge" is nothing more than another way of saying "some say". Rumor and innuendo. Prove it or squat on it. )
      Can we say this point is settled, and move on?

      aaa

      by aaa on January 3rd, 2008

    • Well Schill if you are such an upstanding American citizen, then what would YOU have to hide from these spies that are obviously fascinated with your pitifully boring little life?
      And the guy that wrote the book considers himself quite moderate in his choice of politics as I do, but you are on the hypocrite side of "If your NOT fore us then you are are enemy!" side of the coin that you'd blast anyone on the other for saying, right?

      Capt. Jack  Sparrow  GALCIY

      by Capt. Jack Sparrow GALCIY on January 3rd, 2008

    • The end is in sight Schill. Your case of Bush Derangement Syndrome will be over in Jan '09. Breathe into a paper bag until then.

      aaa

      by aaa on January 3rd, 2008

    18 comments | Post one | Permalink

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Does President Bush-Cheney need the phone companies to lose evidence for them too?

Related Ads