by Xtreme2252 on September 5th, 2007

Xtreme2252

Question

Help answer this question below.

Should animal-rights-violating website like beasttube be banned from the internet so that fifteen year olds, like myself, don't stumble upon disgusting animal rape videos of a guy jacking off a wolf when I'm searching for ordinary wolf videos?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by Lancaster on December 11th, 2007

    Lancaster

    How do you 'stumble upon' a hardcore pornography site, first of all?

    When you visit one of these sites, you are given thumbnail images of what the content is before you watch it, and seeing a page full of titles like "Pussy Knotting" should at least give you some idea as to what you are about to see.

    And if you came from a search engine, it won't display the content within a website like Beasttube because, just like youtube (prior to the google buyout), links to the videos in the database are not crawled by the engine's algorithym. Also, if you were just searching 'wolf' on google, or another search engine, and for some reason beasttube videos were shown on their search pages due to poor programing, then they would be displayed near the end of the search results. This is because these search algorithyms evaluate the results based on how often the word shows up, and on how many links there are to it, so considering the word 'Wolf' is very common on other sites of the internet, and that it would only be used in the title, tags, and metatags of the video, and that al the links to the video would be internal, then this video, if displayed would probably be on either the last or second last page of the billions of results you would be shown.

    As for animal rights abuses, beastiality is usually not considered animal rights abuse. Not only is it legal in most western countries, the places in the west that have banned it are usually either ruled by a rich fundamentalist and moralist elite, like the southern United States, or merely have these laws as a hold-over from colonial or victorian times.

    The question as to whether or not it is rape is simple. Sexual assault laws refer to persons, not animals. Sexual acts between non-persons fall beyond the scope of criminal law and cannot be considered rape. In fact, referring to it as rape could make you subject to a libel lawsuit by beastiality practitioners.

    And as for whether or not it should be banned, that question is moot. The internet is not ruled over by any one governing body. If you are living in Sudan where sex with an animal is punishable by jail terms and several lashes, and possesion of beastiality pornography is illegal, then it is already banned. However, if you are living in a place like Washington state, where sex with an animal is not only legal, but there are farms operating that allow people to go there and have sex with an animal for a fee, then it is not banned. The laws of the internet are different from region to region, voyeur videos are illegal in Canada, but not in Britain, Sodomy is illegal in Iran but not in China, etc.

    I do however suspect that you are not a fifteen year old. Instead my guess is that you are someone from with a far right-wing agenda that is posing as a young teenager so that people will raise the tired old arguement of 'think of the children.'

    It seems that people like you have had success though, as Beasttube is no longer in operation. Instead it has been replaced by the mainstream pornographic website, VHO.

    Comments

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Should animal-rights-violating website like beasttube be banned from the internet so that fifteen year olds, like myself, don't stumble upon disgusting animal rape videos of a guy jacking off a wolf when I'm searching for ordinary wolf videos?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads