People have faith in, like myself, in the conceptual, and individual illegal use of words that they deem acceptable, but put a little apprehension or concern into the fact they duplicate to position as their specific for evaluation and the Bill of Rights becomes: Freedom of Speech -- for those who convey communally undesirable bits of dialogue Freedom of Press --- for writers, like myself, who inscribe matter that are not their specific terminology to dispatch them as my own that don't challenge the guidelines or beliefs Freedom of Religion -- Afforded it's my own creed or one I can position off as my own beliefs, not those other 'erroneous' faiths. Freedom of Peaceable Assembly --- excluding the ones who I disagree with like those who deliberate on their acknowledgment, and actually adhere to the policies established. This one is superlative, as it allocates myself to slide all the way through my individual vivacity not including my identifiable distinct views and congregate in an elegance redistributing matters that are not my identifiable innovative beliefs. Freedom to formally request the Government for my own repartitions, because I am to indolent to do everything for my part -- Oh no, we can't have that; it might endanger my evaluation, or the opinions of others. Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure -- I've got nothing to hide, why should I care? As a natural born Citizen, the amendment should safeguard me from any repercussions that might impose on the privileges I have to accumulate the things I require, and allocate them as my own. Freedom from denial of life, liberty and property without due process of law --- But those 'terrorists', or the supplementary scholars in the equivalent classification might understand the verity that I am not an individual who has to understand the regulations established to safeguard me from this clause! Of course, I do have the entitlement to be unsuccessful in the area under discussion I copy the whole thing and put them on my specific terminology, and be indefinitely restrained and persecuted. This is one of the reasons that the Founding Fathers were so keen on having a Bill of Rights and divided/limited government. They explicitly acknowledged that there is dumb panicky populace would run roughshod, and let their government do the same, over unpopular minorities if given the chance.