Would you rather elect government officials who had proven their mediocrity or who were completely unknown.
by 
TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT
ANSWERS: 4
-
If they have been proven to be mediocre then they are a known quantity. If they are unknown, then there is a chance that they are not mediocre. Logic dictates going for the unknown...but experience suggests the unknown candidate will be just as worthless as all the rest.
-
I would research both parties and my vote would go to the one with the most background experience. I couldn't imagine someone taking on a position that they have no experience in. The perfect example is the governor of my state. She has done absolutely nothing but raise state taxes and tax the heck out of small business owners. I can't begin counting the number of local business that have gone under. She was an unknown and people that admit to voting for her say they thought she would make a positive change. It all comes down to what the candidate stands for and whether or not he/she knows how to implement a plan.
-
I'd rather vote for somebody I know can do the job rather than somebody with little or no experience.
-
so you would vote for your undesirable governer to get back in rather than someone with no experience?
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC