by 
denidowi
ANSWERS: 14
-
None.
-
Pete Doherty & Paris Hilton. By the concept, the inept and bad should fall by the wayside, while the apt and fit should prosper and procreate. How, then, after a few millennium's worth of procreation do we end up with people like Paris and Pete? It's a severe break in the pattern. Our intelligence and attractiveness should be increasing markedly, no?
-
None. And why did you ask this three times?
-
Perhaps yourself? Why did you ask this same question three times?
-
The human race entered a phase at some point in our prehistory where cultural innovation became the driving force in our 'evolution' towards whatever we are progressing towards, much more so than the environmental pressures on our physical bodies. And culturally, it benefits a certain set of people to have the rest of us mesmerized by mediocre fuckbags like Paris Hilton. Atleast thats my take on it.
-
How about none of them. What a shock.
-
Fundamentalists and Evangelicals.
-
The kangaroo and the pinguin. Watch further explanation here: http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/778517 Very Important!
-
Unlike some people, I did actually take the time to read your answer, and I took a look at the book you keep asking everyone to look at. No offense, but it was really a load of tripe. Neither that book nor your answer disproves evolutionary theory. Your "astounding discovery" is inaccurate to be frank. And posting it over and over in response to different questions will not make anyone believe you, it just annoys the heck out of everyone. Have a nice day.
-
There are no know animals that are accepted by the best religious scholars nor the best scientific minds that disprove evolution theory.. There is however, some delusional person named Denise that thinks so.He has copied and pasted excerpts from his book all over this site espousing such a fantasy..
-
none...
-
LADIES & GENTLEMAN !!!! IT'S THE BATTLE OF THE MILLENIUM !!!! CREATION VS. EVOLUTION!!! This is going to be a caged, no holds barred match, to the death!!!! In one corner we have EVOLUTION, who brings with it an assortment of weapons, including : records, fossils, actual proof, and even a bit of faith & belief. In the other corner we have CREATION, who brings---wait a minute, CREATION is pulling something from out of a sack, it's a....it's a.... It's a book ?!? CREATION has brought a book to use in battle. And yes a bit of faith & belief. It's unbelievable the way they are going at each other folks ! It's a battle royal. Who will win this grudge match? Who will suffer from their loss? We may never know. Let's watch & see, and pray ours is the victorious one, which ever that may be.
-
I was at a debate last week where a common shit fly had a rather strong argument against evolution - That his kind were perfect and always were. - A wild horse presented an argument for Artistic Design - and I must say she spoke most eloquently and beautifully on the sight of wild horses running over the plains. This argument was well supported by a few truly beautiful naked young women - a sight that more strongly argues for Artistic design I can't imagine. - Of course an amazing counter-argument was presented by an E-Coli that kept evolving right there on the podium. It was so distracting that one had a hard time listening to what she said. - However, it was ruled by the council, made up of 3 mosquitoes, a catfish, 2 humans, 913,000,000 various bacteria, and an earthworm that no two animals actually disproved evolutionary theory.
-
Total opposites -- snakes and men? Thats not true at all. You are proclaiming a half-truth, listing all of the different things but none of the similarities. And even if they were opposites, how does that even disprove evolution? Much of the argument is flawed, both the premises and the logic. Because i dont see how even if the premises were true ( and the look false to me) that the conclusion would even follow. Is is something like this: 1) Evolution is random 2) If something is random, it cant generate opposites 3) Men and snakes are complete opposites 4) Therefore, evolution cant be real Because that argument isnt sound, valid, or even good for that matter.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC