well any building can of course be hit, and while it is not high it is wide so a good attack down ward could do it i suppose hopefully i didn't just help terrorist

Well, the guy who crashed into the Pentagon pretty much proved it was possible... And you said it yourself: "You would need high precise pilots." Maybe the pilot who crashed into the Pentagon flew high & was trained very well.

You don't need to be a precise pilot to hit a building as big as the Pentagon.

Well, it was staged...you know, like the moon landing. Amazing job they did fooling all those who WITNESSED it, not to mention those INSIDE. I doubt that you would need much precision to hit a building as big as the Pentagon and I also doubt that the place it was hit was pinpointed either. I don't imagine they much cared WHERE it was hit, as long as it was hit. Which it was..and that makes it physically possible for a plane to hit it. How can anyone question that after the fact?

The Pentagon is the biggest office building in the world. It would be hard to miss! The Pentagon sits on 34 acres of land including the five acre center court, making a footprint large enough to accommodate five Capitol buildings. The Pentagon has 6,500,000 gross square feet of space.

Here is how it is physically possible. Keep the plane above 75 Knots. Roughly steer toward the building. Run into building. What part of 1+1+1=3 are you missing? And "high precise pilots"? If the pilot was high, he would have been more likely to miss. CONSPIRACY THEORY ALERT! WOOOP WOOOP!

To hit the Pentagon does not seem to have been so difficult am 11/09/2001. It could have been made from a plane just as much as it was possible to hit the two towers of the World Trade Center. To get there, you would have needed either someone with a pilot training (this seems to have been the case), or a threatened pilot. In the contrary to the WTC hits, no live videos of the hit on the Pentagon were published as it happened. There have been conspiracy theories about the question whether the Pentagon was hit by the Boeing 757 of Flight 77 or whether it could have been a missile. The published evidence could have pointed at the possibility that the observed damage was caused by a missile, not by a plane: "Claims that the Pentagon was hit by something other than the Boeing 757 of Flight 77 have been raised, based on photographs taken after the attack, in which there appears to be a lack of expected debris or damage in and around the impact area, along with the FBI seizure and refusal to release nearby security camera footage which, it is assumed, would have captured the attack on video. The first proponent of the "No Boeing" theory was Thierry Meyssan through his book 9/11: The Big Lie and website Hunt the Boeing! His claims have been further popularized by the Internet videos Loose Change and "911 In Plane Site"" Source and further information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories#The_Pentagon Further information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77