by 
FauxLo
ANSWERS: 10
-
My answer: geography.
-
Their objective as relative to the nation of the soldier. There is no such thing as a terrorist. There's only people whom have different ideals as you. Terrorists are soldiers of their own 'army', whether small or large.
-
Soldiers are usually considered to be part of a military of a recognized government while terrorists are typically not government sponsored, however there are exceptions.
-
err could it be that they are spelt differently :)
-
The difference is who's side you are on.
-
Soldiers are usually focused on eliminating enemy fighters - other soldiers/military. Terrorists blow up people to promote fear. The one act of terror I can think of that was actually directed at a military target was when they bombed the USS Cole. They took a boat up to a ship that was not in a state of combat and blew themselves up.
-
Generally speaking the difference lies in tactics. A soldier is a member of his country's army, carrying out his government's instructions, which do not include deliberately targeting non-combatants. A terrorist's main method is to aim his efforts at the civilian population to spread terror among the civilian population.
-
tactics, a uniform (or lack thereof), a country, restraint, and a cause If you have to ask details about each one, you're a lost cause.
-
If a soldier and terrorist conduct themselves the same way,use the same tactics,etc,then only the terms are different.In Vietnam ,the My Lai massacre ,when US troops killed a village of unarmed men ,women and children(about 500), is more considered a terrorist activity performed by soldiers.
-
A soldier is not tasked with driving a vehicle laden with explosives into a crowded marketplace and detonating it, killing as many innocent civilians as possible. I guess what I'm saying is that a soldier attacks a threat and a terrorist attacks absolutely innocent and defenseless people.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC