by 
noname
ANSWERS: 7
-
I believe that personal hygiene is the only difference...not that I've looked into it much or anything
-
I am unaware there is down sides to either way.Most of the worlds male population is uncircumsized so there must be something to it's popularity.It is an unnecessary and painful procedure.I figure if one is born that way why mess with nature.
-
It is said that circumcision will keep it cleaner than if you aren't circumcised... However, since the discovery of running water... This is no longer the case... Oh, and if you -aren't- circumcised, then you'll apparently be pissing off some God(s). ***** So, uh... If you are circumcised then you are missing a piece of skin, if you aren't circumcised then you still have it - they are the only pros/cons of the procedure (you can decide for yourself which is a pro and which is a con, lol)
-
Circumcised males lose a lot of nerves in the foreskin. So I'm guessing it doesn't feel as good. :p On the other hand, you could say just because it doesn't feel as good, you can last longer. ;) But all in all I don't think there's much of a difference, and the hygiene factor is bull, as long as you clean yourself up once a day, at least.
-
well well well....in some cultures & religions it is a must...studies show that circumsized men have a lower risk of penile cancer....men are less likely to contract urinary trac inf. plus it is easier to clean.
-
It has recently been found that circumsized men who indulge in high-risk sex are only half as likely to catch HIV/AIDS as uncircumcized men. However, there are two solutions which are both better and less drastic than surgery: don't indulge in high-risk sex, or use a condom.
-
depends on whether you like crew-necks or turtlenecks
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC