by 
Fun
ANSWERS: 12
-
I have no idea, but that's ridiculous. People should lighten up a little, I mean...I asked a question about doing the #2 and the #1 earlier and that wasn't flagged. I don't get it!
-
IDK Fun. I moderate a lot. But I wouldn't mark that as spam/offensive. I would recategorize it though ;)
-
It's grammatically incorrect. Should read, "...HAVE someone's..." Maybe the AB Grammar Police flagged it, LOL.
-
LOL maybe because you said boogers??? hahahahaha
-
I don't know but how is this in "financial planning"?
-
well it was under computer networking but then it should have been flagged "wrong catagoy"
-
I do not find this question offensive at all. I would ask the AB staff to reconsider. Good luck, Fun!
-
You've got to be kidding me. Surely there is a way to find out who marked this. I mean come on. This is a valid question. In a clinical setting they used to reuse everything. Heck at the hospital where i worked they used to re sharpen needles. This was years ago but,man. I just don't get this place somethimes..
-
I do not think that is either spam or offensive. I think it is funny.
-
Looks like the censure borough took offense to the word 'boogers' I am only assuming and perhaps the general doubt that dentists follow proper guidelines in hygiene.
-
I got a good laugh out of it ! I find burps, boogers and farts humorous ;-)
-
Seems like someone just wasn't happy with the wording. Although the question is valid, seems whoever flagged that thought you should have worded it a little more eloquently. Then it seems like whoever approved the flag needs to actually go by the AB rulebook and not approve/deny flags based on what THEY think is appropriate... Alot of good questions get moderated that should not be.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC