It does not adress the subject one way or the other.

No it does not. Now this is just my theory on it, but I don't think that a year to man is the same as a year to God. So with that line of thinking, the "big bang" while an explosion to use could very well have been God creating light, then forming the planets, then separating the land from the sea, and so on. I don't feel that I can assume that God operates on my time schedule. But that's just my opinion.

As said in another answer, the Big Bang COULD have been created by God, if not then where did IT come from :o)

no

As our understanding of a problem becomes greater it doesn't necessarily eliminate God but makes its presence less necessary in order to explain phenomena. The start of the universe is not understood well enough yet to make that claim. Much as we once needed God to explain lightening. Now we have a good understanding of the mechanism we don't need God any more. Note this doesn't mean God isn't making lightening just that he appears to be superfluous to requirement. However the issue of God is that as a unfasifiable metaphysical concept you can always make an ad hoc move. You can make God completely un-testable as a hypothesis which means you can never prove it one way or the other. As in the above example, we don't think lightening is god throwing bolts of electricity at the Earth now but you could still argue that god is ultimately responsible for the mechanism and so God does make lightening. Once we get a better theory it will seem God is not needed but that wouldn't be enough to say there is no God. For the record though if something is not necessary I see no point in introducing it to the explanation. I think lightening is a charge of electricity that builds up in the upper atmosphere and happens due to the existence of a potential difference which eventually causes a current to flow, I don't then need to add "which God makes happen". I see no need to do so, the mechanism is both necessary and sufficient to explain the phenomenon.

The Big Bang Theory suggests only that there was a Big Bang of mass that evolved into planets,stars,etc and is still expanding. There is no suggestion at all regarding a creator.

The big bang theory has nothing to do with religious thought and everything to do with science.There is no connection.

The Big bang theory suggests that since everything in the universe is expanding away from everything else, then at some point everything must of started from a single point. There are different theories in physics and cosmology that are attempting to describe this. M-Theory transcends the boundaries that general relativity and quantum mechanics run into during this event and is the current front runner for the ToE. But as far as suggesting there is no creator, the big bang theory does not. It is simply the description of an event that must of taken place if you follow the expansion of the universe back in time far enough. The idea of a creator/overlord/god is not a scientific one, which is why it is left out of the discussion.

No, but it might suggest the mechanism He put in place.