ANSWERS: 10
  • None, and there isn't even evidence that there are any to be found.
  • According to US Republican Senator, Rick Santorum from Pennsylvania, and FOX News, (June 22nd, 2006) have been discovered hundreds weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- However, no credible evidence were offered to support such claims. Bush & Co have been trying desperately to find anything remotely resembling a weapon of mass destruction, probably hoping to restore some credibility.
  • CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq
  • Believe me when I say I am NOT defending Bush..but considering all the time that passed between ordering Iraq to allow inspectors and actually allowing them in..wouldn't they have had time to do away with any WMDs and evidence? And what did they use to massacre the Kurds? Wasn't it some kind of gas and wouldn't that be considered a WMD? I was just wondering. :-)
  • We have more WMD's in our own country than Saddam could ever have dreamed of having.
  • Depends on your definition of WMD's... . If your definition of WMD's are nukes and biological nukes only-------zero . If your definition of WMD's includes not only nukes, but also chemical weapons (such like the ones saddam used to MASS exterminate his own people)--------thousands
  • ZERO. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy