Should the Nobel Prize Committee create a new prize category for the environment?
by 
Grandma Roses - my avatar is my real dog
ANSWERS: 3
-
They just did for Al Gore!
-
I think that would turn into a political popularity contest, so my vote is no. Being right in environmental subjects takes years, or lifetimes to prove right or wrong, so this field of study is not conducive to this type of competition and award program.
-
Yes, If someone will transform living obstacles into living opticals they should be a Nobel Prize winner for the environment. People look around obstacles not around opticals. The reason that the price of television and television service has gone up is because people have let they're outdoor environment remain dormant. That's what happened to real estate. When people don't use their real estate they move hoping to get a change of environment. When the observer is able to observe the outdoor environment grow around them the environment is lively. It is the process or technique of photography that keeps people indoors, therefore the same process can be used to get people into an outdoor environment without the use of film. People get tired of decorating obstacles to make an optical and illuminating obstacles that they will look around to see where they have decorated, that is the costly sum. If you can't watch it grow it's not alive. Make the efficient romance, keep it alive. Yours truly, Frances Romances the King of Swing.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC