| The last question was answered in just | 1 | minute Let our thousands of members help! |
Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know.
Sort answers by:
Rating |
Date
Top Answer out of 6 by Blank Savage Yadalanh on Sep 10, 2007 at 3:08 am Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 2 out of 6 by iwnit on Sep 10, 2007 at 7:00 am Permalink
Comments
FYI: Taking pictures of statues and other public works of art that are copyrighted is a violation of copyright law (with a few exceptions).
Anonymous: I suppose you are right. However, one should certainly consider different uses of these photographs:
- commercial use - personal use (family and friends) - fair use: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
Just because something is intended for personal use, or not for commercial use, does not mean it qualifies as fair use. Fair use is a term that is often thrown around, but it really is a very narrow doctrine. Think about this: you take a picture of you and your family in front of a copyrighted statue for personal use and upload it on one of the internet sites that allows you to share your photo's. The picture is for personal use but is not transmitted/searchable by millions of people. Despite your non-commercial, personal use, of my copyright, the fair use doctrine is not likely to protect you.
Answer 3 out of 6 by ANONYMOUSE on Sep 10, 2007 at 2:48 am Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 4 out of 6 by Anonymous on Sep 10, 2007 at 11:52 am Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 5 out of 6 by DA BEN DAN yanggui zi COAT on Sep 10, 2007 at 3:15 am Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Comments
Terrorism threats? I guess they might think you're taking photos to pass onto terrorists so they can make plans and maps.
Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

