Which is more dangerous - A gun or a swimming pool?
by 
MrBLT needs to be contained
ANSWERS: 13
-
By themselves, neither. It depends on the person using them.
-
a swimming pool, if there's no bullet in the gun...
-
I agree with nelsons comment. But in my line of work I would say guns.
-
It depends who the owner of them are, and if they are owned with safty in mind.
-
I dont think either are dangerous if used properly.
-
Most likely, nobody ever drowned because of a gun, and nobody has ever been shot with a swimming pool. I say they're about equal.
-
I would say a gun.A gun can be and is used intentionally to kill another. A swimming pool is allot less dangerous for it not have the ability to make a decision to grab you and drown you. One just needs to be aware of the swimming pool,and keep away if one cannot swim.
-
a gun is far more dangerous , but if you cant swim then they are both deadly .
-
"If you both own a gun and have a swimming pool in the backyard, the swimming pool is about 100 times more likely to kill a child than the gun is." http://timlambert.org/2001/07/levittpoolsvsguns/ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/are-you-ready-for-swimming-pool-season/ Remember guns don't kill people, OJ Simpson kills people.
-
"If you both own a gun and have a swimming pool in the backyard, the swimming pool is about 100 times more likely to kill a child than the gun is." http://timlambert.org/2001/07/levittpoolsvsguns/ http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/are-you-ready-for-swimming-pool-season/ Remember guns don't kill people, OJ Simpson kills people.
-
None of them only gun dangerous in the hands of criminals, not inthe hands of good people , they just protect themselves and their property with tiit.
-
Guns do not Kill People.....Swimming Pool attendants with Guns do....
-
Depends on how you use them.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC