ANSWERS: 5
  • The way to change a law is not by breaking it.
  • They are doing as they are ordered, which is a horrible travesty. Medical marijuana has so much potential to help people with certain conditions, and to deny it is a despicable act of government gone wrong. The DEA is full of hard-working, dedicated decent men and women who have a tough, dangerous occupation that they believe is helping to save this country. I don't fault them personally, but I disagree strongly with the national policy on prohibiting medical marijuana.
  • Not if it's legal in that state. It's even in the Constatution that the Federal Government will take no action on a State's rights and that's what this is. It's underminning a State's right to have it's own laws. Now if it's some drug dealer with a growing farm in the basement raid away.
  • No. Absolutely not. First, I don't believe it's constitutional, although the Supreme Court disagrees citing federal supremacy; I believe each state should set its own policy regarding this issue and the issue of drug consumption. Second, the federal government is interfering with its states own internal democratic processes. Third, states should be able to set policies regarding medical and scientific research of drugs. Fourth, this violates a person's right to put into his or her own body what one chooses. Fifth, this robs certain states interest in sales taxes collected from dispensaries.
  • ­The federal laws need to be changed. The DEA is going against the will of the voters, that won't last for long. Medical Marijuana Segmet - THC Van Nuys Raid:

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy