Would you rather A) be a world-class skill at one thing and useless at everything else or B) be just barely adequate at everything?
by 
ANSWERS: 3
-
I think I'd choose the first, only downside is if you become ill or have an accident and lose that skill. You mean a jack of all trades and a master of none? I think many of us fall into that category, myself included, I actually like the anonymity and privacy that comes with being barely adequate.
-
B). This way you can attempt to do your best at everything you try.
-
A would be really terrible. What if - say - I were a genius rocket scientist? Then I wouldn't be able to dress myself, to feed myself, to bathe myself, to walk, to see, to run...to do anything a typical human is capable of doing. * B would also be a poor situation, but not nearly as bad as would be the first situation.
-
-
bostjan the adequate 🥉 So you think Stephen Hawking led a less fulfilling life than Joe Schmo?
-
⭐️Creamcrackered 
𝘑𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘺 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 ⭐ RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC