ANSWERS: 5
  • Supposibly there is evidence, but it has not yet confirmed the theory yet. Most of the evidence doesn't related to it.
  • Yes, abundant. Scientists base theory on evidence. Start with the link below. There's a lot more. http://www.nap.edu/html/creationism/evidence.html
  • There is a lot of evidence of something appearing and then disappearing adn then something replacing it, but no, repeat NO, transitionary fossils have been found yet. Here is the logic: If the evolutionists had the evidence of true, honest to something evidence you would have had it rammed down your throat by now. You would have seen the evidence all over the news since the day it was found. But alas, it is not there. They produce smoke and then ask you to hold up your own mirror.
  • There is no such thing as "matter-to-man evolution". Evolution is the process of life changing over time, and that is a fact. Abiogenesis is the process of life arising from non-life, and so far we do not know how that occurred. Obviously we know that it DID occur by the simple fact that we are here- even the most devout Creationists believe that Abiogenesis occured. The only difference is what was the trigger to start the process. There are some strong scientific theories, as well as some experiments that have come close, but noting as substantial as the proof for evolution.
  • I believe there is so that is why I started M2M Matter to Man in 1994. The main evolution is in our brain, not just of us as a people, but even of us as individuals. Even in the moment.

Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

Answerbag | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy