If u were in the desert, starving, would you rather eat: a snake, a lizard, or a beetle?
by 
monkeymanz2
ANSWERS: 14
-
i'd go for the snake. it seems the least strange is most filling.
-
It depends, Would I have to kill it myself? okay if it is a rattlesnake, I'll have to settle for the gross beetle. I take my answer back, I would rather just wait and hope for another choice to show up.
-
a snake, you can get allot more meat.. and I'm sure it's that tasties out of the three.
-
snake
-
o yea-the snake is a rattlesnake, the beetle has powerfull pincers, which mean ur wound could get infected, and the lizard is reaally fast. now what? lol ;)
-
snake - it would be most filling, and probably the easiest to kill/catch.
-
A snake. I can cook it to something reasonably chicken-like :)
-
beetle unless the snake is not poisonous thent he sanke becaue you can just rip the head of and go... the lizard has all sorts of limbs and crud that you have to mess with and seem worse to eat
-
A snake, bet it tastes like chicken.
-
Mmmm. Snake-Kabobs. Lizards are too ugly and I wouldn't want to mess with it. Sankes have to be much easier to prepare.
-
snake is pretty tasty as long as you can catch it
-
Whichever one had the misfortune to cross my path first.
-
Snake, they say it is a tasty nutritious meat.
-
Have you ever seen the show "Man vs. Wild" with Bear Grylls on the Discovery Channel? He has done all of the above. My mom has told me that she had grilled rattlesnake once and apparently it tastes like chicken. Either way, if I was starving I'd probably eat anything that wouldn't debilitate me in any way.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC