Without.

Some are gay and some don't give a shit so it all evens out in the wash.

If this stat is true, then some women share and others have each other. Not bad. Why not?

Since when does not attending college make someone less?

Maybe at least a third of them do without boys at least some of the time. Not a bad idea. He'ing and she'ing gets in the way of paying dues.

I think we should gear our thinking into getting it so that it is an equal ration of males to females again. It is best for the country in the long run....

No. I did my share to help out in college. I dated one and half women.

they get educations and don't need men to support them.

I pity the poor women who had to marry the likes of Michael Dell, Bill Gates, and Wayne Huizenga. They deserved someone with a Liberal Arts degree.

What happen to the rest of the males out in the world? Limitations are for those who don't see any futther than their own backyard.

Let's not forget that a good number of women are only in college to meet someone who will pay their college bills (that is, marry).

I think a lot of young women settle anyhow...Not realizing their full worth and potential yet.....so it was bound to happen anyway

The fact that more women get an academic achievement does not mean that they lead in the workforce. "(February 2007) Since 1991, the proportion of young women enrolled in college has exceeded the enrollment rate for young men, and the gap has widened over time.1 In 2005, about 43 percent of women ages 18 to 24 were enrolled in college, compared with 35 percent of young men. This represents a major shift in the gender balance at U.S. colleges and universities. Between 1970 and 2005, the gender composition has shifted to the extent that women now make up the majority—54 percent—of the 10.8 million young adults enrolled in college. Several reasons have been cited for this crossover, including gender differences in academic achievement (girls do better in high school than boys), changes in societal values, and a shift in women’s expectations for future employment.2 Some researchers have focused on these trends as a positive development for young women, who still lag behind men in labor force participation rates and earnings.3 Others view these trends as evidence of the growing social, behavioral, and economic problems facing young men, particularly those in lower-income groups.4 Some colleges are now actively recruiting male students in order to bring men’s enrollment rates in line with those of women.5 Regardless of whether these trends are good or bad, they need to be viewed in a broader context. In particular, what happens to these highly educated women once they leave college? And how do these gender differences relate to broader race/ethnic and state/regional differences in enrollment? Policymakers and campus officials need to pay attention to these issues before they create new gender-based recruitment policies and programs. Women Lead in College but not in the Workforce Colleges need to balance women’s advantage in enrollment rates against their disadvantage in the post-college labor force. Women’s earnings, relative to those of men, have not kept up with their gains in educational attainment. In 2005, the median weekly earnings for women working full-time were $585, compared with $722 for men.6 Part of this difference reflects the higher concentration of men in higher-paying fields, including the natural and physical sciences, mathematics, and engineering. At the college level, fewer women than men take courses in science-related fields. The U.S. economy can benefit greatly from women’s educational gains, but only if women are working in occupations that can use their specialized knowledge and skills." Source and further information: http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/CrossoverinFemaleMaleCollegeEnrollmentRates.aspx

there are two additional choices. have none and concentrate on their education, or have a man OUTSIDE of college. why restrict her choice of men to the student body?