Terrorist expert Neil Livingstone says that Hasan IS a terrorist. Why some of you deny that Hasan is a terrorist?
by 
FairLady
ANSWERS: 8
-
Right now he isn't fitting the U.S. law definition of terrorist. http://terrorism.about.com/od/whatisterroris1/ss/DefineTerrorism_5.htm .you did not provide a link and I can not find anything on why Mr. Livingstone is saying he is a terrorist. I think it is more of a wait and see what happens after the investigation.
-
Because admitting that Hussein was a terrorist overlooked by CIA due to Eric Holder foray into those quarters would mean that the other Hussein was on terrorists' payroll too.
-
The word "terrorist" is not well defined. His attack was not designed to cause terror to the population at large, and therefore does not match *my* definition of a terrorist. To me, his actions were just (another) gun rampage. This one happens to have been motivated by the Muslim religion, but otherwise it resembles other gun rampages, not carefully pre-planned terrorist events like 9/11
-
Who has said he wasn't? And more importantly will the Republicans admit that he was in the Army for most of their tenure? And is Scott Roeder a Terrorist?
-
Wasn't it Ronald Reagan who said that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom-fighter?
-
Anyone can call themselves an expert. What are this guy's credentials?
-
What qualifies a person to become a terrorist expert?
-
He IS a terrorist. He was in contact with other terrorists. His actions are part of what defines terrorism... "...are perpetrated for an ideological goal, and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants." I'm guessing he'll be added to the military's death row.
Moongrim 
Hardcore Conservative RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC