- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
There SHOULD be 'flexibility' in our court system...thats why there is mitigating circumstances ( this goes in the defendants favor.) And Aggravating circumstances. (This makes it tougher on the defendant.)
Laws need flexibility because no one situation is the same as the next. That is why I have never supported mandatory minimums. If some judges do not show good common sense when passing judgment, kick 'em out,don't take away the other judges' ability to do their job as they see fit.
It all depends on the situation. That's why we have Judges. To hopefully mete out Justice and to see the difference between the Spirit of the Law, and the Letter of the Law.
My Bank american bank account was charged for online gambling , is that legeal ? Can banks process these charges ?
by nmullins1 on February 9th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What's up with this 'Are you 18' thing?
by miserypop on January 16th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
My friend is a care giver for a family, while at work the home caught of fire.Her car was damaged by fire, is it covered by Home ins.
by jgiustini on January 28th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
how do I find out the length of a federal sentence. I know his sentice date and crime need to know when he will be out.
by fnp93 on March 4th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Filing late for widow SS benefits(depression-shock & grief), told would only be paid for 6-months back. Why? I am entitled to them!
by battywu on January 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Should laws be followed strictly without flexibility or are they guidelines that allow for the application of common sense?
Comments