Would you define a "good" person as one who does things to benefit self and others and a "bad" person as one who does things to benefit self and harm others or is that too simplistic?
by 
RosieGHM Jetpacker
ANSWERS: 3
-
I would say the 'good' person must go beyond any selfish motive and be selfless in acting for the benefit of other. Any incidental benefit to self is acceptable. The 'bad' person would be the one who hurts others for no benefit accruing to self and derives pleasure from that. Is my definition too much of a hardliner?
-
A bit simplistic. Benefitting others at the cost of some other others. Can be bad too.
-
Imho, you 'got it right' there at the end! ;-)
Moongrim RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC