Yes.

No way! OR HIS WIFE. So you want me to give you details about his sexually relations, his bad politics, his inability to tell the truth even when caught? I don't like either! They are crocked! Slow cooking lies! Not that I would reelect Bush either! Now can you give me my points back!

Not at all. I'm just not a big fan of his politics. I do, however, support the removal of term limits. I have always thought that the people should vote for whatever candidate the want. Term limits also limit our options as voters.

NO. The Constitution was amended just too prevent, the power of incumbency from turning a president into a monarch after the Roosevelt presidency. It was an excellent idea.

No. I would not. I was burned the first time and would never do it again.

No, I wouldn't vote BC into office again. He was an embarrassment to the nation. He wasn't the only President to be, and he wasn't and won't be the last President to be. His administration did some great things and some really stupid things... as they all do! Typically (not always), a Presidents rating drops during their 2nd term. I think it would be very hard for a 3rd term re-election for most.

Absolutely. That man was diplomatic, intelligent and charismatic. That's far more than we can say for the current Commander In Chief - hummer or no hummer in the Oval Office. I don't care what's going on under his desk; I care about what's ON his desk.

No. I don't think anyone would do more with more time. It works just fine the way it is. I didn't think Clinton did much in the eight years he was President anyway.

Yes. He was an okay President compared to the latest fool. So what if he couldn't keep it in his pants? Have you seen Hilary?

No..once bitten, twice shy.

yes i would...he was a great president. so what if he had an affair, dont we all, what makes him different? he is a man just like any other. i thought he was great and did alot for us, and even for all you who feel he did nothing and that he was a bad president, i could tell you this, we had alot more peace than we have now with this bush mother flower. i bet you that if clinton was in office 911 woulnt have happened and if it did, clinton would've looked for peace instead of war. honestly bush suck and i would elect mostly anyone who would run against him (not everyone)

Never. He was bad enough the first time.

NO!

Twice was enough ... for anyone.

Yes, but only for one term. I think that with the major hole the current administration as dug the country into, it would be best to elect someone we as a nation have experience with and whom we know is a competent politician. He drove the deficit down before, I think it's safe to say that he could do it again. His infidelity is of no concern to me, it's high time this nation realised that good "Family Values" and a controversy-free personal life do not necessarily equal a good leader. But after that first term, no. I think the U.S. is in bad need of someone with new political principles, someone who can take the nation's government, both on internal and international affairs, in an entirely different direction, because the one we're already headed in *Clearly* isn't working. I think that Clinton probably *Could* do that, but I also think that it would be better to give other potential leaders the chance to introduce their ideas to the game.

absolutely..in a heartbeat. He was a great politician and diplomat..and I could care less if he cheated on his wife with consenting adults...that was between him and Hillary..not my business..didn't effect his ability to do his job in any way shape or form..I don't expect the president to be my moral leader (look that the current one who claims to be *moral* and is the biggest liar we have ever had in the position)..I leave that to my religious leader.

1) It would be a good idea to change the constitution in this way. In every country where it is allowed there use it and it is not really good. Think an Saddam Hussein, Hosni Mubarak and the like. Maybe Bush could be elected again. Think seriously about this! 2) Why would we not vote for Hillary. It stays in the family. 3) I would rather give the young people a chance. 4) Anyway, I am not an US citizen...

I would not vote for him, but I agree that term limits for President can be a frustrating proposition. Only one man out of 42 ever got elected to a third (and then a fourth) term. It took something like 1 and 1/2 centuries for a President to be elected to that third term, 1789 to 1932. That means it is incredibly difficult for it to occur in this country. The Republicans panicked in 1951 when they made this the law of the land, for 2 term limits. Sure, it must have been rough to live through five consecutive Democrat terms, but they miscalculated. Truman became very unpopular and decided against running in 1952 (he could have, since he was exempt from the new law). Eisenhower was extremely popular after Truman and could probably have been elected to a 3rd term. I think both sides lost a lot of possibilities with that rule. Also, I believe that peoples' expectations are lowered by having that cap. The public and the administration start to countdown regardless of popularity, and it creates all sorts of problems. FDR had problems in his second term but he overcame them to win a third term. However, most Presidents have worn out their welcome after 2 terms. I think that this fact negates the need for the amendment that Congress passed 50+ years ago. The people should decide when to keep their Presidents and for how long.

As if he's not by using his wife as a straw man... I didn't vote for him the first two times, so why would I vote for him again?

No.I didn't vote for him in either election.